Resuscitation · 2007
Beta-blocker use and the changing epidemiology of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rhythms.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Youngquist Scott T, Kaji Amy H, Niemann James T
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The incidence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) as the presenting rhythm in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is declining, whereas pulseless electrical activity (PEA) is increasing. This changing epidemiology has occurred concomitant with an increase in beta-blocker use.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to measure the association of beta-blocker use among prehospital cardiac arrest patients with PEA versus VF as presenting rhythm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, records of all OHCA patients presenting to a single municipal hospital between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2006 were reviewed. Age, sex, race, first documented rhythm, estimated down time, presence of bystander CPR, return of spontaneous circulation, beta-blocker use, and comorbid illnesses were noted. A Mantel-Haenzel chi-square was computed to describe the association between beta-blocker use and PEA, compared to beta-blocker use and VF. A sensitivity analysis was also performed to account for missing data, misclassification of beta-blocker use, misclassification of initial rhythm, confounding by unknown factors, and random error.
RESULTS: After exclusion of patients with asystole and patients in whom beta-blocker use was unclear/unknown, a cohort of 179 arrests was evaluated. The odds ratio for beta-blocker use among PEA versus VF patients was 3.7 (95% CI 1.9-7.2), and probabilistic adjustment for exposure and outcome misclassification, confounding, and random error increased the odds ratio to 5.0 (95% CI 1.1-31.0).
CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be an association between beta-blockers and the changing epidemiology of arrest rhythms, which may account for the increasing incidence of PEA and concomitant decrease in VF.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to measure the association of beta-blocker use among prehospital cardiac arrest patients with PEA versus VF as presenting rhythm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, records of all OHCA patients presenting to a single municipal hospital between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2006 were reviewed. Age, sex, race, first documented rhythm, estimated down time, presence of bystander CPR, return of spontaneous circulation, beta-blocker use, and comorbid illnesses were noted. A Mantel-Haenzel chi-square was computed to describe the association between beta-blocker use and PEA, compared to beta-blocker use and VF. A sensitivity analysis was also performed to account for missing data, misclassification of beta-blocker use, misclassification of initial rhythm, confounding by unknown factors, and random error.
RESULTS: After exclusion of patients with asystole and patients in whom beta-blocker use was unclear/unknown, a cohort of 179 arrests was evaluated. The odds ratio for beta-blocker use among PEA versus VF patients was 3.7 (95% CI 1.9-7.2), and probabilistic adjustment for exposure and outcome misclassification, confounding, and random error increased the odds ratio to 5.0 (95% CI 1.1-31.0).
CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be an association between beta-blockers and the changing epidemiology of arrest rhythms, which may account for the increasing incidence of PEA and concomitant decrease in VF.