The British journal of radiology · 2026
Coronary atherosclerosis, myocardial perfusion, and interstitial fibrosis between diabetic and nondiabetic patients with stable chest pain: a propensity score matching study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yuan Jiajun, Xu Yidan, Ding Xiaoying, Yu Yarong, Yu Lihua, Dai Xu, Ling Runjianya, Wang Yufan, Luo Qian, Zhang Jiayin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of diabetes mellitus on coronary atherosclerosis, myocardial perfusion, and interstitial fibrosis using cardiac CT.
METHODS: This study included 409 diabetic patients with stable chest pain who prospectively underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA), stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI), and late iodine enhancement (LIE). Additionally, 413 symptomatic non-diabetic patients were retrospectively enrolled as controls. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed based on cardiovascular risk factors. Cardiac CT parameters including coronary artery calcium score, stenosis extent, high-risk plaque features, stress myocardial blood flow, and myocardial fibrosis were compared.
RESULTS: Diabetic patients exhibited lower global stress myocardial blood flow [143.1 vs. 147.2 ml/100 ml/min; p = 0.001] and a higher incidence of myocardial ischemia (43.8% vs. 31.3%; p = 0.003). Diabetes remained an independent predictor of ischemia [odds ratio: 2.070; 95% confidence interval: 1.413-3.033; p < 0.001]. In CAD-RADS 0 patients, diabetes was associated with higher ischemia rates (33.7% vs. 14.5%; p = 0.004), and in CAD-RADS 1-2 patients, with more frequent napkin-ring signs (NRS) (10.3% vs. 3.5%; p = 0.042). Coronary calcification and myocardial fibrosis showed no significant difference between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes is associated with impaired myocardial perfusion. Even in the absence of coronary atherosclerosis, diabetic patients have a higher prevalence of myocardial ischemia. In patients with nonobstructive CAD, diabetes was associated with a higher frequency of NRS.
ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Diabetes is associated with myocardial perfusion deficits and high-risk plaque independent of other cardiovascular risk determinants.
METHODS: This study included 409 diabetic patients with stable chest pain who prospectively underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA), stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI), and late iodine enhancement (LIE). Additionally, 413 symptomatic non-diabetic patients were retrospectively enrolled as controls. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed based on cardiovascular risk factors. Cardiac CT parameters including coronary artery calcium score, stenosis extent, high-risk plaque features, stress myocardial blood flow, and myocardial fibrosis were compared.
RESULTS: Diabetic patients exhibited lower global stress myocardial blood flow [143.1 vs. 147.2 ml/100 ml/min; p = 0.001] and a higher incidence of myocardial ischemia (43.8% vs. 31.3%; p = 0.003). Diabetes remained an independent predictor of ischemia [odds ratio: 2.070; 95% confidence interval: 1.413-3.033; p < 0.001]. In CAD-RADS 0 patients, diabetes was associated with higher ischemia rates (33.7% vs. 14.5%; p = 0.004), and in CAD-RADS 1-2 patients, with more frequent napkin-ring signs (NRS) (10.3% vs. 3.5%; p = 0.042). Coronary calcification and myocardial fibrosis showed no significant difference between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes is associated with impaired myocardial perfusion. Even in the absence of coronary atherosclerosis, diabetic patients have a higher prevalence of myocardial ischemia. In patients with nonobstructive CAD, diabetes was associated with a higher frequency of NRS.
ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Diabetes is associated with myocardial perfusion deficits and high-risk plaque independent of other cardiovascular risk determinants.