MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/ijn.12199

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of nursing practice · 2013

Nursing students' experiences of being video-recorded during examination in a fictive emergency care situation.

Nyström Anita, Pålsson Ylva, Hofsten Anna, Häggström Elisabeth

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Promoting undergraduate nursing students' learning in simulated care can be achieved through dynamic scenario-based training sessions that are documented using simple video equipment. One valuable aspect of this kind of training is the subsequent reflective dialogue that takes place between the teacher and the students during the examination. The aim of the present paper is to describe bachelor nursing students' experiences of being video-recorded during an examination with a simulated patient in emergency care. The study was descriptive in design and used a qualitative approach with written answers to open-ended questions; 44 undergraduate nursing students participated. A latent content analysis resulted in three themes: (i) visualization might cause nervousness at first; (ii) visualization promotes dialogue and acknowledgement; and (iii) visualization promotes increased self-knowledge and professional growth. The conclusion is that video-recording is a good way for undergraduate nursing students to develop skills in emergency care situations and to understand their own actions; it might also help them increase their self-knowledge.

Для цитирования: Nyström Anita, Pålsson Ylva, Hofsten Anna, Häggström Elisabeth. Nursing students' experiences of being video-recorded during examination in a fictive emergency care situation.. International journal of nursing practice. 2013. DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12199.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.