MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0301-2115(03)00012-5

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2003

Verifying the effectiveness of medical abortion; ultrasound versus hCG testing.

Fiala Christian, Safar Peter, Bygdeman Marc, Gemzell-Danielsson Kristina

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The combination of mifepristone and misoprostol is an established method for termination of pregnancy. However, there is no general agreement about how best to evaluate the treatment outcome.

STUDY

DESIGN

In 217 women with an unwanted pregnancy below 49 days of amenorrhoea, ultrasound examination and serum hCG test were performed before treatment and at follow-up.

RESULTS

Treatment was successful in 98.2%. At follow-up their hCG dropped to a mean of 3% (S.D. 3) of initial levels and the endometrium measured a mean of 10 mm (S.D. 4). Interpretation of endometrium was difficult in some cases because of inhomogeneous structure. Using hCG was reliable in 98.5% of successful abortions. For ultrasound the corresponding figure was 89.8% for the cases with a confirmed intrauterine pregnancy before treatment but only 66% if all pregnancies were included.

CONCLUSION

Measuring serum hCG before treatment and at follow-up is more effective than ultrasound to confirm a successful medically induced abortion in early pregnancy.

Для цитирования: Fiala Christian, Safar Peter, Bygdeman Marc, Gemzell-Danielsson Kristina. Verifying the effectiveness of medical abortion; ultrasound versus hCG testing.. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2003. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(03)00012-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.