MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.037

Медицинская библиотека · Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2016

The neural mechanisms of hallucinations: A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

Zmigrod Leor, Garrison Jane R, Carr Joseph, Simons Jon S

СтатьяМетаанализОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging data was used to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying auditory-verbal and visual hallucinations (AVHs and VHs). Consistent activation across studies during AVHs, but not VHs, in Wernicke's and Broca's areas is consistent with involvement of speech and language processes in the experience of hearing voices when none are present. Similarly, greater activity in auditory cortex during AVHs and in visual cortex during VHs supports models proposing over-stimulation of sensory cortices in the generation of these perceptual anomalies. Activation across studies in the medial temporal lobe highlights a role for memory intrusions in the provision of content for AVHs, whereas insula activation may relate to the involvement of awareness and self-representation. Finally, activation in the paracingulate region of medial prefrontal cortex during AVHs is consistent with models implicating reality monitoring impairment in the misattribution of self-generated information as externally perceived. In the light of the results, the need for unified theoretical frameworks that account for the full range of hallucinatory experiences is discussed.

Для цитирования: Zmigrod Leor, Garrison Jane R, Carr Joseph, Simons Jon S. The neural mechanisms of hallucinations: A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.037.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.