Acta neurochirurgica · 2021
Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury: systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Henry Jack, Amoo Michael, Murphy Adam, O'Brien David P
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a common neurosurgical intervention for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), as well as malignant stroke, malignancy and infection. DC necessitates subsequent cranioplasty. There are significant demographic differences between TBI and non-TBI patients undergoing cranioplasty, which may influence their relative risk profiles for infection, aseptic bone flap resorption (aBFR) and re-operation.
OBJECTIVE: Perform a meta-analysis to determine the relative infection, aBFR and re-operation risk profiles of TBI patients as compared to other indications for DC.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Google Scholar were searched until 26/11/2020. Studies detailing rates of infection, re-operation and/or aBFR in specific materials and the post-TBI population were included, while studies in paediatrics or craniosynostosis repair were excluded.
RESULTS: Twenty-six studies were included. There was no difference in relative risk of infection between TBI and non-TBI cohorts (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.57-1.17), with insignificant heterogeneity (I2 = 33%). TBI was a risk factor for aBFR (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.25-1.89), with no significant heterogeneity (I2 = 13%). TBI was a risk factor for re-operation in the autologous sub-group (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.05-2.11) but not in the alloplastic sub-group (RR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.34-2.18). Heterogeneity was insignificant (I2 = 11%).
CONCLUSION: TBI is a risk factor for aBFR and re-operation following cranioplasty. Use of an alloplastic graft for primary cranioplasty in these patients may partially mitigate this increased risk.
OBJECTIVE: Perform a meta-analysis to determine the relative infection, aBFR and re-operation risk profiles of TBI patients as compared to other indications for DC.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Google Scholar were searched until 26/11/2020. Studies detailing rates of infection, re-operation and/or aBFR in specific materials and the post-TBI population were included, while studies in paediatrics or craniosynostosis repair were excluded.
RESULTS: Twenty-six studies were included. There was no difference in relative risk of infection between TBI and non-TBI cohorts (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.57-1.17), with insignificant heterogeneity (I2 = 33%). TBI was a risk factor for aBFR (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.25-1.89), with no significant heterogeneity (I2 = 13%). TBI was a risk factor for re-operation in the autologous sub-group (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.05-2.11) but not in the alloplastic sub-group (RR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.34-2.18). Heterogeneity was insignificant (I2 = 11%).
CONCLUSION: TBI is a risk factor for aBFR and re-operation following cranioplasty. Use of an alloplastic graft for primary cranioplasty in these patients may partially mitigate this increased risk.