Physiotherapy · 2014
Goal setting, using goal attainment scaling, as a method to identify patient selected items for measuring arm function.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ashford Stephen, Jackson Diana, Turner-Stokes Lynne
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Following stroke or brain injury, goals for rehabilitation of the hemiparetic upper limb include restoring active function if there is return of motor control or, if none is possible, improving passive function, and facilitating care for the limb. To inform development of a new patient reported outcome measure (PROM) of active and passive function in the hemiparetic upper limb, the Arm Activity measure, we examined functional goals for the upper limb, identified during goal setting for spasticity intervention (physical therapy and concomitant botulinum toxin A interventions).
DESIGN: Using secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort study, functional goals determined between patients, their carers and the clinical team were assigned into categories by two raters. Goal category identification, followed by assignment of goals to a category, was undertaken and then confirmed by a second reviewer.
PARTICIPANTS: Participants comprised nine males and seven females of mean (SD) age 54.5 (15.7) years and their carers. Fifteen had sustained a stroke and one a traumatic brain injury.
RESULTS: Goals were used to identify five categories: passive function, active function, symptoms, cosmesis and impairment. Two passive function items not previously identified by a previous systematic review were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of goals important to patients and carers revealed items for inclusion in a new measure of arm function and provide a useful alternative method to involve patients and carers in standardised measure development.
DESIGN: Using secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort study, functional goals determined between patients, their carers and the clinical team were assigned into categories by two raters. Goal category identification, followed by assignment of goals to a category, was undertaken and then confirmed by a second reviewer.
PARTICIPANTS: Participants comprised nine males and seven females of mean (SD) age 54.5 (15.7) years and their carers. Fifteen had sustained a stroke and one a traumatic brain injury.
RESULTS: Goals were used to identify five categories: passive function, active function, symptoms, cosmesis and impairment. Two passive function items not previously identified by a previous systematic review were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of goals important to patients and carers revealed items for inclusion in a new measure of arm function and provide a useful alternative method to involve patients and carers in standardised measure development.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overArmBrain InjuriesCohort StudiesDisability EvaluationExercise TherapyFemaleHemiplegiaHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational TherapyPain MeasurementPatient Care PlanningProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionStrokeStroke RehabilitationTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdom