MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/aog.0b013e3181d055d4

Медицинская библиотека · Obstetrics and gynecology · 2010

Continence pessary compared with behavioral therapy or combined therapy for stress incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.

Richter Holly E, Burgio Kathryn L, Brubaker Linda, Nygaard Ingrid E, Ye Wen, Weidner Alison, Bradley Catherine S, Handa Victoria L, Borello-France Diane, Goode Patricia S, Zyczynski Halina, Lukacz Emily S, Schaffer Joseph, Barber Matthew, Meikle Susan, Spino Cathie, Pelvic Floor Disorders Network

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of a continence pessary to evidence-based behavioral therapy for stress incontinence and to assess whether combined pessary and behavioral therapy is superior to single-modality therapy.

METHODS

This was a multisite, randomized clinical trial (Ambulatory Treatments for Leakage Associated with Stress Incontinence [ATLAS]) that randomly assigned 446 women with stress incontinence to pessary, behavioral therapy, or combined treatment. Primary outcome measures, at 3 months, were Patient Global Impression of Improvement and the stress incontinence subscale of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory. A priori, to be considered clinically superior, combination therapy had to be better than both single-modality therapies. Outcome measures were repeated at 6 and 12 months. Primary analyses used an intention-to-treat approach.

RESULTS

At 3 months, scores from 40% of the pessary group and 49% of the behavioral group were "much better" or "very much better" on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (P=.10). Compared with the pessary group, more women in the behavioral group reported having no bothersome incontinence symptoms (49% compared with 33%, P=.006) and treatment satisfaction (75% compared with 63%, P=.02). Combination therapy was significantly better than pessary as shown on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (53%, P=.02) and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (44%, P=.05) but not better than behavioral therapy; it was therefore not superior to single-modality therapy. Group differences were not sustained to 12 months on any measure, and patient satisfaction remained above 50% for all treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Behavioral therapy resulted in greater patient satisfaction and fewer bothersome incontinence symptoms than pessary at 3 months, but differences did not persist to 12 months. Combination therapy was not superior to single-modality therapy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00270998.

Для цитирования: Richter Holly E, Burgio Kathryn L, Brubaker Linda, Nygaard Ingrid E, Ye Wen, Weidner Alison, Bradley Catherine S, Handa Victoria L, Borello-France Diane, Goode Patricia S, Zyczynski Halina, Lukacz Emily S, Schaffer Joseph, Barber Matthew, Meikle Susan, Spino Cathie, Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Continence pessary compared with behavioral therapy or combined therapy for stress incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2010. DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3181d055d4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.