MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00404-015-3667-4

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2015

Risk factors predicting an emergency cesarean delivery for the second twin after vaginal delivery of the first twin.

Spiegel Efrat, Kessous Roy, Sergienko Ruslan, Sheiner Eyal

СтатьяTwin StudyПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To investigate obstetrical risk factors predicting failure of vaginal delivery and an emergency cesarean section (CS) for the second twin after vaginal delivery of the first twin. In addition, the study was aimed to define perinatal outcomes of the second twin.

STUDY

DESIGN

A retrospective study was conducted, comparing all deliveries of twins in which CS was performed for the second twin to those in which both twins were delivered vaginally during the years 1988-2010. Women with multiple gestations in which a CS was performed for both twins were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1966 vaginal deliveries of the first twin were recorded; 192 involved emergency CS for the second twin. Risk factors for emergency CS of the second twin were preterm delivery, previous CS, placental abruption and breech presentation of the second twin. Perinatal outcomes did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for emergency cesarean section of the second twin are preterm delivery, previous CS, placental abruption and breech presentation. Nevertheless, short-term perinatal outcomes are comparable to twins delivered vaginally.

Для цитирования: Spiegel Efrat, Kessous Roy, Sergienko Ruslan, Sheiner Eyal. Risk factors predicting an emergency cesarean delivery for the second twin after vaginal delivery of the first twin.. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-015-3667-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.