MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000065157

Медицинская библиотека · Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau · 2002

[Medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol: study of the efficacy, somatic tolerance and perception of medical abortion].

Schwendke A, Zarkadas M, Alder J, Horner E, Bitzer J, Holzgreve W

Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

This prospective study examined the efficacy and somatic tolerance as well as the perception of the different phases of medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol. The subjective influence of counseling and accompanying on perception and psychic sequelae was evaluated.

METHOD: The somatic data of the patients who had a medical abortion at Basel University Hospital of Gynecology and Obstetrics from December 1, 1999, to October 31, 2000, were identified in the case records. A questionnaire at the time of the abortion and a structured interview by telephone 6 months later were used to assess the perception of the abortion.

RESULTS

Abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol was successful in 95.2% of cases. Counseling and accompanying were considered supportive by 90.4 and 73.7%, respectively. The psychological workup was without problems in 95.5%.

CONCLUSION

Medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol was successful in 95.2%. Our concept of counseling and accompanying was well received and resulted in an uneventful psychological workup in most cases.

Для цитирования: Schwendke A, Zarkadas M, Alder J, Horner E, Bitzer J, Holzgreve W. [Medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol: study of the efficacy, somatic tolerance and perception of medical abortion].. Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau. 2002. DOI: 10.1159/000065157.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.