m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
BMC neurology · 2026

Seizure prophylaxis versus epilepsy prevention after acquired brain injury: a cross-sectional clinicaltrials.gov registry analysis, 2000-2026.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Chimakurthy Anil, Susarla Viswabhaskar, Chaudhary Jeet Hemantkumar, Desai Om

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Seizures after acquired brain injury pose distinct therapeutic questions: early seizure prophylaxis, treatment of acute symptomatic seizures, and late epilepsy prevention. These endpoints are often conflated, although early seizure suppression does not establish disease-modifying antiepileptogenesis, these end points are often confused.

METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov records that were first posted from January 1, 2000, to June 18, 2026. Records retrieved through four disease-specific seizure-related searches were exported from the ClinicalTrials.gov web interface, deduplicated by NCT number, and adjudicated into a primary seizure-management or sensitivity/monitoring cohort. A purposively selected validation set of 269 potentially eligible or difficult-to-classify records underwent independent post-review classification by 2 reviewers who were blinded to each other's responses. A prespecified secondary subset comprised completed primary-cohort trials evaluating pharmacologic interventions.

RESULTS: The searches yielded 1,054 exported records and 878 unique records after deduplication. Final adjudication retained 85 primary cohort studies and 39 sensitivity/monitoring records. Brain tumor/neurosurgery (27/85, 31.8%) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) (23/85, 27.1%) predominated, whereas intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage each had only 3 trials. Among the 44 completed or discontinued trials, 17 (38.6%) were discontinued. Among 26 completed trials eligible for results-reporting assessment, 11 (42.3%) had posted results, of which 10 (90.9%) were interventional drug trials. Only 3 of 15 completed pharmacologic trials had a late-prevention aim. Reviewer agreement ranged from 85.1% to 90.3%, with unweighted Cohen kappa values of 0.776-0.825.

CONCLUSIONS: The seizure management pipeline after acquired brain injury registered on ClinicalTrials.gov is concentrated in brain tumor/neurosurgery and TBI, with sparse representation of hemorrhagic stroke and few completed pharmacologic trials targeting late epilepsy prevention. The registry findings support a clearer separation of the objectives of acute seizure prophylaxis, treatment of acute symptomatic seizures, and late epilepsy prevention. The etiology-specific design recommendations are presented as an author-proposed framework rather than empirical effectiveness conclusions.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты