MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5692/clinicalneurol.cn-001289

Медицинская библиотека · Rinsho shinkeigaku = Clinical neurology · 2019

[Difficulties in distinguishing abnormal intensities associated with convulsion from tumor on MRI: a case report].

Wadayama Tomoya, Ito Aya, Otsubo Ryoichi, Otani Kyoko, Morikawa Masashi, Ueda Naoko

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A 48-year-old man was admitted to our department with generalized convulsive seizures followed by recurrent partial clonic convulsions in the left face and arm. Convulsions stopped temporarily after administration of diazepam, fosphenytoin, and levetiracetam. However, frequent partial seizures occurred repeatedly and general anesthesia was required to control seizures. Diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted images revealed a high-intensity lesion in the right frontal lobe. A tumor-like area in the white matter showed high intensity on T2-weighted images with ring enhancement on gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images. An area of frontal cortex near the tumor was also enhanced. Brain surgery was performed for the purposes of diagnosis, seizure control and tumor resection. Histological findings demonstrated oligodendroglioma in the ring-enhancing area, but not in the frontal cortex. This fact indicated that contrast enhancement of the frontal cortex was caused by status epilepticus. It is important to recognize that status epilepticus could cause contrast enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging.

Для цитирования: Wadayama Tomoya, Ito Aya, Otsubo Ryoichi, Otani Kyoko, Morikawa Masashi, Ueda Naoko. [Difficulties in distinguishing abnormal intensities associated with convulsion from tumor on MRI: a case report].. Rinsho shinkeigaku = Clinical neurology. 2019. DOI: 10.5692/clinicalneurol.cn-001289.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.