MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.11.004

Медицинская библиотека · Heart, lung & circulation · 2024

Prophylaxis to Prevent Cardiotoxicity in Patients Receiving Anthracycline for Breast Cancer: A Combined Bayesian and Frequentist Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Jeyaprakash Prajith, Sangha Sukhman, Low Gary, Yu Christopher, Pathan Faraz, Negishi Kazuaki

СтатьяСистематический обзорNetwork Meta-AnalysisПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The benefits in survivorship gained with anthracycline (ANT)-based chemotherapies for breast cancer are unfortunately mitigated for some patients by irreversible cardiotoxicity. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have explored multiple cardioprotection options, however, it remains unclear which drug is most effective in preserving left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This study aimed to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis, using Bayesian and frequentist approaches, of RCTs evaluating cardioprotective agents.

METHODS

Two authors searched four databases (CENTRAL, Cochrane Reviews, MEDLINE, SCOPUS), to find RCTs evaluating cardioprotective agents. Trial populations were limited to patients with breast cancer without prior ANT exposure. The primary outcome was mean LVEF change pre and post ANT dosing. Our primary analysis utilised a Bayesian approach, while our sensitivity analysis used frequentist methodology (Prospero registration number CRD42020199580).

RESULTS

From 4,007 search results, we identified 12 RCTs, with their various trial arms considered separately-nine beta-blocker (BB), two angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor /angiotensin receptor blockers [(AA)+BB=AABB], one AA, one spironolactone, one statin-evaluating 1,126 patients (age 50.5 years). Bayesian network meta-analysis showed no difference in LVEF preservation between AA (1.3%, 95% credible interval [-0.20, 2.9]), BB (0.77, [-0.21, 1.8]), AABB (0.84 [-1.1, 2.8]), spironolactone (0.72, [-2.3, 3.7]) or statin (0.60, [-2.4, 3.6]) when compared against placebo. However, the frequentist analysis showed benefits from using AA (mean difference, 1.32% [0.32, 2.33]) and BB (mean difference, 0.76% [0.12, 1.4]).

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to support prophylactic cardioprotection to prevent EF reduction. However, frequentist analysis suggested that AA or BBs provide cardioprotection. Thus, for those already on other anti-hypertensives, switching to AA or BBs could be considered.

Для цитирования: Jeyaprakash Prajith, Sangha Sukhman, Low Gary, Yu Christopher, Pathan Faraz, Negishi Kazuaki. Prophylaxis to Prevent Cardiotoxicity in Patients Receiving Anthracycline for Breast Cancer: A Combined Bayesian and Frequentist Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.. Heart, lung & circulation. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.11.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.