MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/brs.0000000000003804

Медицинская библиотека · Spine · 2021

Migration of a Lumbar Spinal Fusion Rod Into the Posterolateral Knee: A Case Report.

Long Mitchell King-Wei, Enders Tyler, Leven Dante, Cappellino Anthony

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Case report (level V evidence).

OBJECTIVE

We report a case of a 33-year-old man with Marfan syndrome that visited our clinic for left knee pain and stiffness. Radiographs of the left knee and lumbar spine demonstrated a spinal rod in the posterolateral left knee and its origin being a broken rod from his previous unilateral spinal fusion 17 years prior.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal arthrodesis is a common treatment modality for a wide range of spinal pathologies including infection, trauma, congenital and developmental deformities, and degenerative conditions. A rare complication that may arise from said procedure is implant migration, most often a result of pseudoarthrosis.

METHODS

Description of the case report.

RESULTS

Patient was taken to the operating room 2 weeks later for an uneventful removal of the implant and immediate improvement with pain and range of motion.

CONCLUSION

Spinal implant migration is a rare complication most often due to implant failure from pseudoarthrosis. In the case presented, this phenomenon was likely attributed to the use of unilateral instrumentation coupled with Marfan syndrome, shown to lead to insufficient implant stability and poorer fusion rates, respectively.Level of Evidence: 5.

Для цитирования: Long Mitchell King-Wei, Enders Tyler, Leven Dante, Cappellino Anthony. Migration of a Lumbar Spinal Fusion Rod Into the Posterolateral Knee: A Case Report.. Spine. 2021. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003804.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.