MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s41372-021-01068-9

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021

Effect of continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal cannula on late preterm and term infants with transient tachypnea of the newborn.

Chiruvolu Arpitha, Claunch Kevin M, Garcia Alberto J, Petrey Barbara, Hammonds Kendall, Mallett Lea H

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with nasal cannula (NC) as primary noninvasive respiratory therapy in hypoxic infants for transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN).

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of infants born at ≥34 weeks of gestation between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018.

RESULT: After adjusting for gestational age and birth weight, the maximum fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2) was significantly lower in the CPAP group with an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.76-0.96). Although nonsignificant, the CPAP group needed 32% fewer hours on oxygen with an IRR of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.38-1.22). The duration of respiratory support and the incidence of pneumothorax were similar between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Comparing CPAP with NC as initial noninvasive respiratory therapy for TTN, significantly lower maximum FiO2 was observed in the infants of CPAP group without increase in the incidence of pneumothorax.

Для цитирования: Chiruvolu Arpitha, Claunch Kevin M, Garcia Alberto J, Petrey Barbara, Hammonds Kendall, Mallett Lea H. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal cannula on late preterm and term infants with transient tachypnea of the newborn.. Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association. 2021. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-021-01068-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.