Molecular metabolism · 2024
Crosstalk interactions between transcription factors ERRα and PPARα assist PPARα-mediated gene expression.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Desmet Sofie J, Thommis Jonathan, Vanderhaeghen Tineke, Vandenboorn Edmee M F, Clarisse Dorien, Li Yunkun, Timmermans Steven, Fijalkowska Daria, Ratman Dariusz, Van Hamme Evelien, De Cauwer Lode, Staels Bart, Brunsveld Luc, Peelman Frank, Libert Claude, Tavernier Jan, De Bosscher Karolien
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) is a transcription factor driving target genes involved in fatty acid β-oxidation. To what extent various PPARα interacting proteins may assist its function as a transcription factor is incompletely understood. An ORFeome-wide unbiased mammalian protein-protein interaction trap (MAPPIT) using PPARα as bait revealed a PPARα-ligand-dependent interaction with the orphan nuclear receptor estrogen-related receptor α (ERRα). The goal of this study was to characterize the nature of the interaction in depth and to explore whether it was of physiological relevance.
METHODS: We used orthogonal protein-protein interaction assays and pharmacological inhibitors of ERRα in various systems to confirm a functional interaction and study the impact of crosstalk mechanisms. To characterize the interaction surfaces and contact points we applied a random mutagenesis screen and structural overlays. We pinpointed the extent of reciprocal ligand effects of both nuclear receptors via coregulator peptide recruitment assays. On PPARα targets revealed from a genome-wide transcriptome analysis, we performed an ERRα chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis on both fast and fed mouse livers.
RESULTS: Random mutagenesis scanning of PPARα's ligand-binding domain and coregulator profiling experiments supported the involvement of (a) bridging coregulator(s), while recapitulation of the interaction in vitro indicated the possibility of a trimeric interaction with RXRα. The PPARα·ERRα interaction depends on 3 C-terminal residues within helix 12 of ERRα and is strengthened by both PGC1α and serum deprivation. Pharmacological inhibition of ERRα decreased the interaction of ERRα to ligand-activated PPARα and revealed a transcriptome in line with enhanced mRNA expression of prototypical PPARα target genes, suggesting a role for ERRα as a transcriptional repressor. Strikingly, on other PPARα targets, including the isolated PDK4 enhancer, ERRα behaved oppositely. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses demonstrate a PPARα ligand-dependent ERRα recruitment onto chromatin at PPARα-binding regions, which is lost following ERRα inhibition in fed mouse livers.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the coexistence of multiple layers of transcriptional crosstalk mechanisms between PPARα and ERRα, which may serve to finetune the activity of PPARα as a nutrient-sensing transcription factor.
METHODS: We used orthogonal protein-protein interaction assays and pharmacological inhibitors of ERRα in various systems to confirm a functional interaction and study the impact of crosstalk mechanisms. To characterize the interaction surfaces and contact points we applied a random mutagenesis screen and structural overlays. We pinpointed the extent of reciprocal ligand effects of both nuclear receptors via coregulator peptide recruitment assays. On PPARα targets revealed from a genome-wide transcriptome analysis, we performed an ERRα chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis on both fast and fed mouse livers.
RESULTS: Random mutagenesis scanning of PPARα's ligand-binding domain and coregulator profiling experiments supported the involvement of (a) bridging coregulator(s), while recapitulation of the interaction in vitro indicated the possibility of a trimeric interaction with RXRα. The PPARα·ERRα interaction depends on 3 C-terminal residues within helix 12 of ERRα and is strengthened by both PGC1α and serum deprivation. Pharmacological inhibition of ERRα decreased the interaction of ERRα to ligand-activated PPARα and revealed a transcriptome in line with enhanced mRNA expression of prototypical PPARα target genes, suggesting a role for ERRα as a transcriptional repressor. Strikingly, on other PPARα targets, including the isolated PDK4 enhancer, ERRα behaved oppositely. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses demonstrate a PPARα ligand-dependent ERRα recruitment onto chromatin at PPARα-binding regions, which is lost following ERRα inhibition in fed mouse livers.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the coexistence of multiple layers of transcriptional crosstalk mechanisms between PPARα and ERRα, which may serve to finetune the activity of PPARα as a nutrient-sensing transcription factor.