DOI 10.17116/hirurgia202602163
[Effectiveness of autologous cells of stromal-vascular fraction of adipose tissue depending on transplantation method for skin grafting in patients with extensive deep burns].
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To analyze different methods for autologous transplantation of stromal-vascular fraction of adipose tissue combined with skin grafting with split-thickness skin graft 1:6 in patients with extensive deep burns.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
Open comparative controlled prospective study was devoted to results of autologous skin grafting with split-thickness skin graft 1:6 and autologous cells of stromal-vascular fraction of adipose tissue. Patients were divided into 4 groups depending on transplantation method: injection, aerosol, combined (aerosol+injection) and comparison group (standard skin grafting with split-thickness perforated transplants).
UNLABELLED: There were 43 cases. Inclusion criteria: age 18-65 years, total area of skin burn 10-60% of body surface area, deep burn 10-45% of body surface area. Autologous skin grafting was performed on 10-15% of body surface area. Clinical, laboratory, cytological and histological methods were used to evaluate postoperative outcomes.
RESULTS
Combined (injection+aerosol) transplantation method was followed by significantly earlier engraftment (by 5 days, 9.9 ±0.7 days in the main group and 14.5±0.88 days in the control group, Student's t test 3.518) and reduction of postoperative complications to 6% (in the control group 27%).
CONCLUSION
Analysis of biotechnological methods for surgical treatment of patients with extensive deep burns showed the effectiveness of combined (aerosol+injection) transplantation and skin grafting with split-thickness skin graft. This approach reduced skin recovery time and incidence of postoperative complications.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.