Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 1990
Long-term comparison of the electrical characteristics of polyurethane and polyethylene insulated ventricular leads.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bluhm G, Larsen F F, Nordlander R, Pehrsson S K
Аннотация
Two types of pacing leads with different insulation material, polyurethane, and polyethylene, were followed for 44 months with respect to their electrophysiological characteristics and complications. In 48 patients, 32 polyurethane leads (Lifeline 493-03) and 16 polyethylene leads (EMT 588 D) were implanted and connected in all cases to the same type of programmable ventricular inhibited (VVI) pulse generator (Programalith, Pacesetter). There was a significant fall during the follow-up in lead impedance with the polyurethane leads (495 +/- 62 to 444 +/- 58 ohms, P less than 0.01), whereas the corresponding measurements for the polyethylene leads were essentially unchanged (360 +/- 58 to 378 +/- 71 ohm, ns). The energy of the stimulation threshold tended to increase in the polyurethane group, whereas an opposite tendency was observed in the polyethylene group. Pacing and/or lead failures were not observed in any case. The observed fall in impedance with the polyurethane leads was seemingly of no clinical significance.