MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ccm.0000000000006882

Медицинская библиотека · Critical care medicine · 2025

Impact of Conservative Vs. Liberal Extracorporeal Oxygen Target During Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support for Cardiogenic Shock: A Pilot Randomized Control Trial.

Winiszewski Hadrien, Puyraveau Marc, Kimmoun Antoine, Piton Gael, Riedweg Karena Moretto, Moltenis Mélanie, Pinel Pierre-André, Besch Guillaume, Guinot Pierre-Grégoire, Capellier Gilles

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if titration of sweep gas oxygen fraction (F D O 2 ) targeting post oxygenator conservative oxygen strategy might decrease organ dysfunction compared with a liberal extracorporeal oxygenation strategy.

DESIGN

Pilot multicenter randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Four ICUs in three teaching hospitals of the eastern France.

PATIENTS: Cardiogenic shock supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO).

INTERVENTIONS: F D O 2 titration targeting postoxygenator oxygen partial pressure (P POST O 2 ) 100-150 mm Hg in the conservative arm, and F D O 2 maintained at 100% in the liberal arm.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS

Primary outcome was mean plasmatic intestinal fatty acid binding protein (IFABP) level at day 2, a marker of gut damage. Secondary outcome were feasibility criteria, biomarkers of hepatic and renal dysfunction, biomarkers of inflammation and antioxidant system. Among the 55 patients analyzed, 29 were assigned to the conservative arm and 26 to the liberal arm. The two arms were well separated over the first 7 days: F D O 2 61 (± 7) % vs. 98 (± 5) %, and P POST O 2 139 (± 40) mm Hg vs. 420 (± 50) mm Hg, in the conservative and liberal arms, respectively. However, in the conservative arm, the mean proportion of time within the targeted window was only 33 (± 20) %. IFABP on day 2 did not differ between conservative and liberal arms (407 [206-549] pg/mL vs. 569 [247-708] pg/mL, p = 0.25). Lactate, vasoactive inotropic score, aspartate aminotransferase, prothrombin time, serum creatinine, need for renal replacement therapy, tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-6 and IL-8 did not differ between the two arms at day 0, 2, and 6 after randomization.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients supported by VA ECMO for cardiogenic shock, a conservative oxygen target strategy was not easily feasible, as P POST O 2 could be maintained within the targeted window only 33% of time. However, the conservative and liberal arms were well separated regarding P POST O 2 , and we did not find any difference in biomarkers of organ dysfunction.

Для цитирования: Winiszewski Hadrien, Puyraveau Marc, Kimmoun Antoine, Piton Gael, Riedweg Karena Moretto, Moltenis Mélanie, Pinel Pierre-André, Besch Guillaume, Guinot Pierre-Grégoire, Capellier Gilles. Impact of Conservative Vs. Liberal Extracorporeal Oxygen Target During Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support for Cardiogenic Shock: A Pilot Randomized Control Trial.. Critical care medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000006882.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.