BMC oral health · 2025
Impact of framework material, cantilever design, and wing configuration on stress distribution in patient specific additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implants: a 3D finite element analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Canko Gokhan, Doganay Ozyilmaz Ozge
Аннотация
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Recent advancements in digital technology have revolutionized implant dentistry, particularly with additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implants (AMSJIs). These implants allow patient-specific designs that adapt to anatomical requirements. However, optimizing stress distribution remains a challenge.
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the stress distribution in AMSJIs and surrounding bone by analyzing different framework materials (PEEK and Co-Cr), anterior wing designs (I- and Y-shaped), and cantilever extensions using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
METHODS: A model was created from a patient with an atrophic, edentulous maxilla. Biomechanical evaluation of eight maxillary implant scenarios was performed under a 200 N force applied at a 45° oblique angle. Stress distribution in the bone, implants, screws, and prosthetic frameworks, as well as prosthetic displacement, was analyzed.
RESULTS: The lowest implant stress (444.5 MPa) was observed in the Co-Cr group without a cantilever using an I-shaped design, whereas the highest stress (623.0 MPa) occurred in the Co-Cr group with a cantilever using a Y-shaped design. Prosthetic displacement was greater in cantilevered groups, with PEEK exhibiting more displacement than Co-Cr.
CONCLUSIONS: The optimal stress distribution was achieved with the I-shaped design without a cantilever, using Co-Cr. Stress levels were significantly influenced by framework material, wing design, and cantilever presence, underscoring the importance of design and material selection.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: While stress remained within physiological limits in all cases, avoiding cantilevers and selecting a rigid material can optimize Y-shaped designs. PEEK demonstrated favorable properties in cantilevered designs, but its long-term effects on soft tissue and implants warrant further clinical trials.
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the stress distribution in AMSJIs and surrounding bone by analyzing different framework materials (PEEK and Co-Cr), anterior wing designs (I- and Y-shaped), and cantilever extensions using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
METHODS: A model was created from a patient with an atrophic, edentulous maxilla. Biomechanical evaluation of eight maxillary implant scenarios was performed under a 200 N force applied at a 45° oblique angle. Stress distribution in the bone, implants, screws, and prosthetic frameworks, as well as prosthetic displacement, was analyzed.
RESULTS: The lowest implant stress (444.5 MPa) was observed in the Co-Cr group without a cantilever using an I-shaped design, whereas the highest stress (623.0 MPa) occurred in the Co-Cr group with a cantilever using a Y-shaped design. Prosthetic displacement was greater in cantilevered groups, with PEEK exhibiting more displacement than Co-Cr.
CONCLUSIONS: The optimal stress distribution was achieved with the I-shaped design without a cantilever, using Co-Cr. Stress levels were significantly influenced by framework material, wing design, and cantilever presence, underscoring the importance of design and material selection.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: While stress remained within physiological limits in all cases, avoiding cantilevers and selecting a rigid material can optimize Y-shaped designs. PEEK demonstrated favorable properties in cantilevered designs, but its long-term effects on soft tissue and implants warrant further clinical trials.