MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/lbr.0000000000000507

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of bronchology & interventional pulmonology · 2018

Nasogastric Tube Syndrome: A Diagnostic Dilemma.

Nayak Gyanaranjan, Virk Ramandeep S, Singh Manvi, Singh Meenu

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Nasogastric tubes have been used in the pediatric age group to supplement nutrition in cases of malignancy and failure to thrive due to a variety of causes. Breathing difficulty may occur after the insertion of a nasogastric tube and it can have multiple causes. Here we discuss 2 patients of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who developed a rare condition called the Sofferman syndrome (nasogastric tube syndrome). We will also briefly outline a diagnostic algorithm to facilitate its fast and correct diagnosis.

METHODS

We present 2 cases of pediatric ALL who were undergoing chemotherapy in the pediatrics department. They presented with respiratory distress and stridor within a few days of nasogastric tube insertion.

RESULTS

Two cases of ALL developed stridor within 48 hours of nasogastric tube insertion. The stridor gradually progressed over days. Both the patients required tracheostomy to secure the airway. Removal of the nasogastric tube did not reverse the airway obstruction.

CONCLUSION

Nasogastric tube syndrome is a potentially life-threatening condition and has to be considered as a possibility in immune-compromised patients who present with voice change and stridor after nasogastric tube insertion.

Для цитирования: Nayak Gyanaranjan, Virk Ramandeep S, Singh Manvi, Singh Meenu. Nasogastric Tube Syndrome: A Diagnostic Dilemma.. Journal of bronchology & interventional pulmonology. 2018. DOI: 10.1097/lbr.0000000000000507.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.