DOI 10.4103/neurol-india.neurol-india-d-24-00695
Endovascular Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke in Octogenarians - Our Experience.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Most contemporary clinical trials of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) have often excluded patients over the age of 80 years. Thus, evidence regarding efficacy of endovascular treatment in the octogenarians is still scanty. The present study assesses the efficacy of MT in octogenarians.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Between January 2015 to December 2020, clinical records of 27 patients (age ≥80 years), who underwent MT for stroke were queried from our database.
RESULTS
Out of total 229 patients, who underwent mechanical thrombectomy during the study period, 29 patients were of age ≥80 years, with a baseline disability (mRS score 0-3). We excluded two patients, who showed recanalization following iv-tPA. Recanalization through MT was achieved in 25 (93%) patients, without any event of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Three had mortality and three patients required a decompressive craniectomy. Eighteen (66%) patients received intravenous thrombolysis prior to MT and nine underwent direct MT. Out of the latter group, three presented beyond the window period for thrombolysis, five were on anticoagulants, and one was in immediate post-surgical period. Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 17 (range 8-22) and ASPECT score was six (range 3-9). Mean post-procedure NIHSS was three (range 1-10). 90-day mRS of 0-2 was achieved in 21/27 (78%) patients.
CONCLUSION
Contrary to the prevalent apprehensions of poor outcomes in elderly stroke patients treated with MT, our study showed favorable radiological and clinical results. Accordingly, more optimistic pre-procedural counselling before MT is probably advisable even in this age group of patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.