MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Radiation medicine · 2005

Relation between chromosomal aberrations and radiation dose during the process of TBI.

Kutsuki Shoji, Ihara Noriko, Shigematsu Naoyuki, Okamoto Shinichiro, Kubo Atsushi

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were (1) to consider the dose-response relationship in-vivo at high dose range by using the Colcemid method, which begins with predicting the risk of future late complication caused by a fixed dose of chromosomal aberration of peripheral lymphocytes after radiation emission and (2) to compare in-vivo and in-vitro dose-responses for chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes of cancer patients undergoing total body irradiation (TBI).

METHODS

Eight patients diagnosed with hematological malignancies entered this study. TBI planning with a 6 MV linear accelerator consisted of 4 Gy/2 fractions/day, and the total treatment dose was 12 Gy.

RESULTS

At the observable dose range of up to 10 Gy, the unstable chromosomal aberrations of both dicentrics and fragments increased with the increment of irradiated dose, regardless of in-vivo or in-vitro irradiated samples. However, the average number of dicentrics and fragments obtained from in-vitro samples was found to be higher than that for in-vivo samples.

CONCLUSION

This result strongly suggests that in-vivo dose-response curves are necessary to estimate the absorbed dose in-vivo. In-vivo dose-response curves obtained from cancer patients would be very important for standard curves for biodosimetry.

Для цитирования: Kutsuki Shoji, Ihara Noriko, Shigematsu Naoyuki, Okamoto Shinichiro, Kubo Atsushi. Relation between chromosomal aberrations and radiation dose during the process of TBI.. Radiation medicine. 2005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.