Medical abortion as an alternative to vacuum aspiration: first experiences with the 'abortion pill' in The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE

To establish to what extent medical abortion is desired as a supplement to existing care provision in The Netherlands and to establish the (dis)advantages of medical abortion versus surgical vacuum aspiration.

METHODS

The research project began in November 1999 and ended in September 2000. In two abortion clinics, the clients were asked to answer some questions about their expectations (before treatment) and their experiences with the treatment (at the post-treatment check-up). At the post-treatment check-up, the clients were also asked to fill out the Hopkin's Symptom Checklist (HSCL) which is an objective measure for the psychological and physical well-being of the clients during the previous week.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-one clients who chose medical abortion and 131 clients who chose surgical vacuum aspiration participated in the study. The failure rate was 3.3% for medical abortion and 1.5% for surgical vacuum aspiration. Of the medical abortion clients, 80.2% reported they were satisfied with this treatment and 68.1% said they would choose the same treatment procedure in the future. For vacuum aspiration, these figures were 92.9% and 83.2%, respectively. The most reported advantage of medical abortion was the fact that it was a pill, and no surgical procedures were necessary. The most reported disadvantages of medical abortion were the amount of blood loss and insecurity concerning the time of abortion.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical abortion seems to be a good supplement to the existing care provision in The Netherlands and should be offered in other clinics.