MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0090-4295(96)00559-6

Медицинская библиотека · Urology · 1997

Laparoscopy in renal transplant patients.

Fornara P, Doehn C, Fricke L, Hoyer J, Jocham D

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the use of laparoscopic techniques in patients with a renal transplant.

METHODS

Since 1992, 358 patients have undergone urologic laparoscopy at our hospital. Among these, 37 procedures (10.4%) were performed in patients with a renal transplant: 14 bilateral nephrectomies for severe drug-resistant hypertension, 9 marsupializations of symptomatic lymphoceles, 6 renal allograft biopsies in patients with clotting abnormalities, 6 unilateral nephrectomies, and 2 nephroureterectomies for recurrent episodes of pyelonephritis and symptomatic vesicoureteral reflux, respectively.

RESULTS

Five complications (14%) and three conversions (8%) occurred. Patients who underwent successful laparoscopic operations began mobilization and oral intake on the day after the operation. The hospital stay ranged from 1 to 6 days. In the nephrectomy groups, perioperative urine outputs remained stable and post-operative urine outputs were increased as compared with those in the perioperative period (P < 0.05). Post-operatively, serum creatinine remained stable or improved in patients who underwent nephrectomy or marsupialization of lymphocele.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that laparoscopic techniques are safe and effective in the treatment of patients with a renal transplant. Renal allograft function apparently is not affected by laparoscopic procedures.

Для цитирования: Fornara P, Doehn C, Fricke L, Hoyer J, Jocham D. Laparoscopy in renal transplant patients.. Urology. 1997. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(96)00559-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.