Comparison of intraluminal radiofrequency ablation and stents vs. stents alone in the management of malignant biliary obstruction.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the added benefit of adding intraluminal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to biliary metal stent placement for patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO).

METHODS

From November 2013 to December 2015, 89 patients with MBO who had undergone percutaneous intraluminal RFA and stent placement (RFA-stent group, n = 50) or stent placement only (stent group, n = 39) were included. Outcomes were compared according to the type of tumour: cholangiocarcinoma or non-cholangiocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Primary and secondary stent patency (PSP, SSP) were significantly higher for the RFA-stent group than the stent group (PSP: 7.0 months vs. 5.0 months, p = 0.006; SSP: 10.0 months vs. 5.6 months, p < 0.001), with overall survival being comparable (5.0 months vs. 4.7 months, p = 0.068). In subgroup analysis, RFA-stent showed significant PSP benefits compared to stent alone in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (7.4 months vs. 4.3 months; p = 0.009), but with comparable outcomes in patients with non-cholangiocarcinoma (6.3 months vs. 5.2 months; p = 0.266). The SSP was improved in both subgroups (cholangiocarcinoma, 12.6 months vs. 5.0 months, p < 0.001; non-cholangiocarcinoma, 10.3 months vs. 5.5 months, p = 0.013). Technical success and clinical success were not significantly different between the two groups. The rate of complication was higher for the RFA-stent group, but tolerable when compared to the stent group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although survival was comparable between the groups, RFA-stent confers therapeutic benefits to patients with MBO in terms of stent patency compared to stent placement alone, especially in those with cholangiocarcinoma.