The Laryngoscope · 2024
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes in Type 1 Thyroplasty Comparing Silastic to Gore-Tex.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vance Dylan G, Allen David Z, Leming Amy B, Cox Madisyn, Fogg Sonya E, Siddiqui Sameer H, Wilson Hallie R, Tritter Andrew G
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Type 1 Thyroplasty is a well-established procedure used for medializing an immobile vocal fold. Silastic and Gore-Tex are the two most common materials used to accomplish this, but comparative data on their relative efficacy are scarce. We sought to compare outcomes between Silastic and Gore-Tex implants via systematic review and meta-analysis for unilateral vocal fold immobility.
METHODS: We collected available data from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science on demographics, maximum phonation time (MPT), voice handicap index (VHI-10/30) score, and any other relevant metrics encountered before comparatively evaluating differences in outcomes.
RESULTS: The search yielded 1,534 records with 55 manuscripts ultimately included. There were 41 unique studies that utilized Silastic for a total of 1038 patients. There were 13 unique studies that utilized Gore-Tex for a total of 245 patients. The pooled mean increase in MPT for Silastic patients was 7.8 s (+1.3 SMD) compared with 5.7 s for Gore-Tex (+1.6 SMD). There was significant publication bias present in both analyses. The pooled mean change in VHI-30 with Silastic was -45.4 (62.2%, -2.09 SMD) compared with -51.6 (73.5%, -1.1 SMD) with Gore-Tex. The pooled mean change in VHI-10 with Silastic was -15.6 (54%, -0.46 SMD) compared with -11.6 (43%, -0.86 SMD) with Gore-Tex. There was no significant publication bias present in VHI outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Silicone and Gore-Tex implants provide adequate and comparable results in TT1. The data supporting this conclusion are limited by follow-up, diversity in outcomes, limited data availability, and publication bias. Future research should be dedicated to comparing implants in a well-randomized environment. Laryngoscope, 135:1236-1247, 2025.
METHODS: We collected available data from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science on demographics, maximum phonation time (MPT), voice handicap index (VHI-10/30) score, and any other relevant metrics encountered before comparatively evaluating differences in outcomes.
RESULTS: The search yielded 1,534 records with 55 manuscripts ultimately included. There were 41 unique studies that utilized Silastic for a total of 1038 patients. There were 13 unique studies that utilized Gore-Tex for a total of 245 patients. The pooled mean increase in MPT for Silastic patients was 7.8 s (+1.3 SMD) compared with 5.7 s for Gore-Tex (+1.6 SMD). There was significant publication bias present in both analyses. The pooled mean change in VHI-30 with Silastic was -45.4 (62.2%, -2.09 SMD) compared with -51.6 (73.5%, -1.1 SMD) with Gore-Tex. The pooled mean change in VHI-10 with Silastic was -15.6 (54%, -0.46 SMD) compared with -11.6 (43%, -0.86 SMD) with Gore-Tex. There was no significant publication bias present in VHI outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Silicone and Gore-Tex implants provide adequate and comparable results in TT1. The data supporting this conclusion are limited by follow-up, diversity in outcomes, limited data availability, and publication bias. Future research should be dedicated to comparing implants in a well-randomized environment. Laryngoscope, 135:1236-1247, 2025.