Sexually transmitted diseases · 2025
Effectiveness of Incentives on Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing Uptake: A Trial Among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Young People in Remote Central Australia (2015-2020).
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Whitford Kate, Silver Bronwyn, Wand Handan, Bell Stephen, McGregor Skye, Donovan Basil, Fairley Christopher, Guy Rebecca, Ryder Nathan, Boffa John, Ward James, Kaldor John
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) cause a substantial disease burden worldwide and disproportionately impact young people. In Australia, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are a priority population in STI testing guidelines.
METHODS: The More Options for STI Testing trial evaluated whether providing an incentive impacted STI testing rates in select Central Australian communities. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 16 to 29 years were eligible for a A$30 phone voucher if they had an STI test at a participating Aboriginal community-controlled primary health care clinic. An interrupted time series analysis examined monthly STI test counts for chlamydia, gonorrhea, or syphilis from 2015 to 2020, to determine whether testing increased during the incentives phase (2018-2020).
RESULTS: There were a total of 10,457 visits to the clinic in which an STI test was conducted, 5110 of which were during the incentives period. A total of 1526 incentives were provided to eligible clients. The baseline and incentives periods were each divided into 2 phases to account for new clinic openings and the COVID-19 pandemic. Among men, average monthly visits for an STI test were 32.6 (baseline phase 1), 44.1 (baseline phase 2), 50.8 (incentives phase), and 35.4 (incentives/COVID-19 phase). Women had 93.5, 111.3, 118.8, and 113.4 visits, respectively. No significant change in STI testing was observed during the incentives phase. The proportion of visits for an STI test where an incentive was paid (coverage) varied by month, from 36% to 76% of consultations.
CONCLUSIONS: The limited impact of incentives could be explained by low coverage or that the incentive was not motivating enough to overcome STI testing barriers. Future studies should investigate alternative methods of increasing STI testing in remote Central Australia, including through primary care clinics.
METHODS: The More Options for STI Testing trial evaluated whether providing an incentive impacted STI testing rates in select Central Australian communities. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 16 to 29 years were eligible for a A$30 phone voucher if they had an STI test at a participating Aboriginal community-controlled primary health care clinic. An interrupted time series analysis examined monthly STI test counts for chlamydia, gonorrhea, or syphilis from 2015 to 2020, to determine whether testing increased during the incentives phase (2018-2020).
RESULTS: There were a total of 10,457 visits to the clinic in which an STI test was conducted, 5110 of which were during the incentives period. A total of 1526 incentives were provided to eligible clients. The baseline and incentives periods were each divided into 2 phases to account for new clinic openings and the COVID-19 pandemic. Among men, average monthly visits for an STI test were 32.6 (baseline phase 1), 44.1 (baseline phase 2), 50.8 (incentives phase), and 35.4 (incentives/COVID-19 phase). Women had 93.5, 111.3, 118.8, and 113.4 visits, respectively. No significant change in STI testing was observed during the incentives phase. The proportion of visits for an STI test where an incentive was paid (coverage) varied by month, from 36% to 76% of consultations.
CONCLUSIONS: The limited impact of incentives could be explained by low coverage or that the incentive was not motivating enough to overcome STI testing barriers. Future studies should investigate alternative methods of increasing STI testing in remote Central Australia, including through primary care clinics.