MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1253/circrep.cr-25-0108

Медицинская библиотека · Circulation reports · 2025

Prognostic Impact of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Patients With Suspected Cardiogenic Shock - A Systematic Review.

Osawa Takumi, Nakayama Naoki, Ishizu Tomoko, Kondo Toru, Nakashima Takahiro, Yamamoto Takeshi, Hanada Hiroyuki, Hashiba Katsutaka, Kirigaya Jin, Hosoya Yumiko, Katasako-Yabumoto Aya, Okazaki Yusuke, Yamamoto Masahiro, Sakamoto Kazuo, Arai Marina, Tanaka Akihito, Matsuo Kunihiro, Yamaguchi Junichi, Mano Toshiaki, Kojima Sunao, Noguchi Teruo, Tsujimoto Yasushi, Kikuchi Migaku, Funazaki Toshikazu, Tahara Yoshio, Nonogi Hiroshi, Matoba Tetsuya, Japan Resuscitation Council (JRC) Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC) Cardiovascular Shock (CS) Task Force and the Guideline Editorial Committee on behalf of the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) Emergency and Critical Care Committee

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Cardiogenic shock, a life-threatening condition frequently encountered in emergency departments, requires rapid diagnosis and management. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is widely used as a bedside tool; however, its impact on prognosis in patients with suspected cardiogenic shock remains unclear. This systematic review aimed to evaluate whether POCUS improves the clinical outcomes in these patients.

METHODS AND

RESULTS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to December 31, 2023, for studies evaluating the prognostic impact of POCUS in adults with undifferentiated shock, including cardiogenic shock. From 3,759 identified records, 2 studies (1 randomized controlled trial [RCT] and 1 observational study) involving 5,711 patients with shock were included. The RCT showed no significant differences in in-hospital mortality between the POCUS and non-POCUS groups (relative risk [RR] 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-1.51]). The observational study reported higher mortality in patients receiving POCUS before intervention (RR 1.25 [95% CI 1.12-1.39]). Overall, POCUS did not significantly reduce mortality in patients with suspected cardiogenic shock. Given the limited number and quality of available studies, the certainty of evidence was low (RCT) and very low (observational study).

CONCLUSIONS

Although POCUS plays an essential role in diagnosis and clinical decision-making, our review suggests that it may not significantly improve prognosis in patients with suspected cardiogenic shock. Further studies are required to determine its prognostic value.

Для цитирования: Osawa Takumi, Nakayama Naoki, Ishizu Tomoko, Kondo Toru, Nakashima Takahiro, Yamamoto Takeshi, Hanada Hiroyuki, Hashiba Katsutaka, Kirigaya Jin, Hosoya Yumiko, Katasako-Yabumoto Aya, Okazaki Yusuke, Yamamoto Masahiro, Sakamoto Kazuo, Arai Marina, Tanaka Akihito, Matsuo Kunihiro, Yamaguchi Junichi, Mano Toshiaki, Kojima Sunao, Noguchi Teruo, Tsujimoto Yasushi, Kikuchi Migaku, Funazaki Toshikazu, Tahara Yoshio, Nonogi Hiroshi, Matoba Tetsuya, Japan Resuscitation Council (JRC) Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC) Cardiovascular Shock (CS) Task Force and the Guideline Editorial Committee on behalf of the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) Emergency and Critical Care Committee. Prognostic Impact of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Patients With Suspected Cardiogenic Shock - A Systematic Review.. Circulation reports. 2025. DOI: 10.1253/circrep.cr-25-0108.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.