MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/eja.0000000000002253

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of anaesthesiology · 2025

Brain protective ventilation in acute brain injury patients with use of fully automated ventilation (BRAVE): A cross-over clinical trial.

Goossen Robin L, Gavinelli Sibilla, Dragoni Simone, van Meenen David M P, Paulus Frederique, Schultz Marcus J, Ball Lorenzo, Patroniti Nicolo' Antonino, Robba Chiara

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Invasive ventilation can be challenging in acute brain injury (ABI) patients as partial pressure of carbon dioxide and oxygen need to be kept in precise optimal ranges while simultaneously applying lung-protective ventilation. Fully automated ventilation may be effective in achieving protective ventilation targets for brain and lung.

OBJECTIVES

To compare automated ventilation to conventional ventilation for ABI patients.

DESIGN

Single-centre, observational, cross-over trial.

SETTING

Primary care hospital in Italy, recruiting in 2024.

PATIENTS: Twenty ABI patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

We performed 3 h of data collection during conventional ventilation followed by 3 h of data collection during automated ventilation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary endpoint was the percentage of breaths in three predefined zones of ventilatory targets, defined as optimal, acceptable and critical. The zones were based on patient-specific ranges of four measures: end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO 2 ), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ), tidal volume (V T ), and maximum airway pressures ( Pmax ).

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients were included. With automated ventilation the proportion [range] of breaths within the optimal zone significantly increased from 2.7% [0.0 to 23.4] to 30.5% [0.9 to 66.3] ( P  < 0.001). Automated ventilation markedly decreased the proportion of breaths in the critical zone, from 16.6% [1.9 to 41.3] to 2.1% [0.5 to 7.4] ( P  < 0.001), while slightly reducing breaths in the acceptable zone from 58.1% [34.4 to 90.9] to 45.1% [25.4 to 90.8] ( P  < 0.001). Optimal breaths increased for EtCO 2 , SpO 2 , and V T , but declined for Pmax with automation. The percentage of time spent in each ventilation zone mirrored the percentage of breaths in each zone.

CONCLUSION

Automated ventilation outperformed conventional ventilation in maintaining protective ventilation targets for brain and lung in ABI patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT06367816.

Для цитирования: Goossen Robin L, Gavinelli Sibilla, Dragoni Simone, van Meenen David M P, Paulus Frederique, Schultz Marcus J, Ball Lorenzo, Patroniti Nicolo' Antonino, Robba Chiara. Brain protective ventilation in acute brain injury patients with use of fully automated ventilation (BRAVE): A cross-over clinical trial.. European journal of anaesthesiology. 2025. DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000002253.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.