DOI 10.1007/s00392-026-02997-1
Performance of a sirolimus-eluting balloon with phospholipid nanocarriers in the treatment of long de novo coronary artery disease: the prospective GINGER trial.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Sirolimus-coated balloons (SCB) may offer improved antiproliferative efficacy over paclitaxel-coated balloons; however, data regarding their performance in de novo coronary lesions are limited.
OBJECTIVES
The GINGER study aimed to evaluate the angiographic efficacy and clinical safety of a SCB (Magic Touch®) in the treatment of long (≥ 25 mm) de novo coronary artery lesions.
METHODS
This observational, prospective, multicenter, single-arm cohort study enrolled patients with at least one long de novo lesion treated with SCB. Co-primary endpoints were late lumen loss (LLL) and net lumen gain at 9 months. Secondary endpoints included: procedural success, periprocedural myocardial infarction, binary restenosis and a device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE), defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI) and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05471245).
RESULTS
A total of 104 patients was enrolled at 8 centers. Mean lesion length was 28.9 ± 16.0 mm and reference vessel diameter was 2.3 ± 0.6 mm. Procedural success was achieved in all cases. At 9-month angiographic follow-up, LLL was 0.28 ± 0.68 mm, net lumen gain 0.62 ± 0.63 mm, and binary restenosis was observed in 33.3% of lesions. Clinical events at 12-month included DOCE in 6.7% of patients, cardiac death in 1.0%, TV-MI in 4.8% and CD-TLR in 3.8%. No lesion thrombosis was reported.
CONCLUSIONS
In a real-world cohort of patients with long de novo coronary lesions, the Magic Touch SCB was associated with a LLL of 0.28 mm, which should be interpreted in light of the high complexity of treated lesions. Future randomized trials are warranted to evaluate its clinical efficacy in comparison with new-generation drug-eluting stents.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.