American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2009
Abdominal sacrocolpopexy and urinary incontinence: surgical planning based on urodynamics.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Elser Denise M, Moen Michael D, Stanford Edward J, Keil Kristinell, Matthews Catherine A, Kohli Neeraj, Mattox Fleming, Tomezsko Janet, Urogynecology Network
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the use of urodynamics to determine the need for incontinence surgery at the time of abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC).
STUDY DESIGN: The records of 441 women undergoing ASC during 2005-2007 were reviewed. Group 1 consisted of 204 women (46.3%) with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI), including occult USI, who underwent incontinence surgery with ASC. Group 2 consisted of 237 women (53.7%) without USI who underwent ASC alone. Primary outcome measures were any complaint of postoperative incontinence (stress or urge) or new-onset urgency/frequency (UF).
RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 46.6 weeks, the overall rate of incontinence was low and similar for both groups (13.4% in group 1 and 13.3% in group 2 [P = .967]), as was new-onset UF: 18.6% in group 1 and 11.5% in group 2 (P = .195).
CONCLUSION: Urodynamic evaluation appears to be useful in determining the need for incontinence surgery at the time of ASC.
STUDY DESIGN: The records of 441 women undergoing ASC during 2005-2007 were reviewed. Group 1 consisted of 204 women (46.3%) with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI), including occult USI, who underwent incontinence surgery with ASC. Group 2 consisted of 237 women (53.7%) without USI who underwent ASC alone. Primary outcome measures were any complaint of postoperative incontinence (stress or urge) or new-onset urgency/frequency (UF).
RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 46.6 weeks, the overall rate of incontinence was low and similar for both groups (13.4% in group 1 and 13.3% in group 2 [P = .967]), as was new-onset UF: 18.6% in group 1 and 11.5% in group 2 (P = .195).
CONCLUSION: Urodynamic evaluation appears to be useful in determining the need for incontinence surgery at the time of ASC.