MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/bpa.13151

Медицинская библиотека · Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2023

Friends or foes: The mononuclear phagocyte system in ischemic stroke.

Ziqing Zhang, Yunpeng Liu, Yiqi Liu, Yang Wang

СтатьяОбзорПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Ischemic stroke (IS) is a major cause of disability and death in adults, and the immune response plays an indispensable role in its pathological process. After the onset of IS, an inflammatory storm, with the infiltration and mobilization of the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS), is triggered in the brain. Microglia are rapidly activated in situ, followed by waves of circulating monocytes into the ischemic area. Activated microglia and monocytes/macrophages are mainly distributed in the peri-infarct area. These cells have similar morphology and functions, such as secreting cytokines and phagocytosis. Previously, the presence of the MPS was considered a marker of an exacerbated inflammatory response that contributes to brain damage. However, recent studies have suggested a rather complicated role of the MPS in IS. Here, we reviewed articles focusing on various functions of the MPS among different phases of IS, including recruitment, polarization, phagocytosis, angiogenesis, and interaction with other types of cells. Moreover, due to the characteristics of the MPS, we also noted clinical research addressing alterations in the MPS as potential biomarkers for IS patients for the purposes of predicting prognosis and developing novel therapeutic strategies.

Для цитирования: Ziqing Zhang, Yunpeng Liu, Yiqi Liu, Yang Wang. Friends or foes: The mononuclear phagocyte system in ischemic stroke.. Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland). 2023. DOI: 10.1111/bpa.13151.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.