MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5664/jcsm.9814

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022

A longitudinal study of the accuracy of positive airway pressure therapy machine-detected apnea-hypopnea events.

Ni Yue-Nan, Thomas Robert Joseph

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVES

During positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for sleep apnea syndromes, the machine-detected respiratory event index (REIFLOW) is an important method for clinicians to evaluate the beneficial effects of PAP. There are concerns about the accuracy of this detection, which also confounds a related question, How common and severe are residual events on PAP?

METHODS

Patients with obstructive sleep apnea who underwent a split-night polysomnography were recruited prospectively. Those treated with PAP and tracked by the EncoreAnywhere system (Philips Respironics, Murrysville, PA) were analyzed. Those who stopped PAP within 1 month were excluded from this analysis. Compliance, therapy data, and waveform data were analyzed. Machine-detected vs manually scored events were compared at the first, third, sixth, and 12th month from PAP initiation. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with a high REIFLOW difference.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-nine patients with a mean age 59.06 ± 13.97 years, median body mass index of 33.60 (29.75-38.75) kg/m2, and median baseline apnea-hypopnea index of 46.30 (31.50-65.90) events/h were included. The difference between the machine-detected REIFLOW and manually scored REIFLOW was 10.72 ± 8.43 events/h in the first month and remained stable for up to 12 months. Male sex and large leak ≥ 1.5% were more frequent in patients who had an REIFLOW difference of ≥ 5 events/h of use. A titration arousal index ≥ 15 events/h of sleep, and higher ratio of unstable to stable breathing were also associated with an REIFLOW difference ≥ 5 events/h of use.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a substantial and sustained difference between manual and automated event estimates during PAP therapy, and some associated factors were identified.

CITATION: Ni Y-N, Thomas RJ. A longitudinal study of the accuracy of positive airway pressure therapy machine-detected apnea-hypopnea events. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(4):1121-1134.

Для цитирования: Ni Yue-Nan, Thomas Robert Joseph. A longitudinal study of the accuracy of positive airway pressure therapy machine-detected apnea-hypopnea events.. Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. 2022. DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.9814.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.