MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000546719

Медицинская библиотека · Skin appendage disorders · 2025

Nail Changes in Secondary Syphilis: A Report of 3 Cases and Review of Literature.

Grover Chander, Agrawal Sonia, Singhal Aakash

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Nail changes have been described in syphilis in all stages. However, they can be subtle and easy to miss. At the same time, they are valuable indicators towards underlying pathology as nail is a useful "window to systemic disease." Onychoscopic features of nail syphilis have not been described in detail.

CASE REPORT: We describe 3 patients (n = 60 nails) with secondary syphilis with involvement of 29/60 (48.3%) nails. Most common clinical nail findings were onychorrhexis (13, 37%), followed by distal onycholysis (10, 28%). Other findings included subungual hyperkeratosis, onychomadesis, Beau's lines, nail plate atrophy, paronychia, and periungual ulceration. Onychoscopic involvement was seen in 32/60 (53.3%) nails. Features observed on onychoscopy were onychorrhexis (13/60) and distal onycholysis (including erosive onycholysis) (12/60). Distinctive features on onychoscopy included alternate white and red lines, longitudinal erythematous bands, and ulcerative onycholysis.

CONCLUSION

Nail involvement in syphilis, particularly the onychoscopic findings, has been under-reported. Varying terminologies have been used over the years as per the literature review. We propose that nail syphilis is best classified based on the site of involvement within the nail unit. Onychoscopy aids the detection of changes which may be missed on clinical examination.

Для цитирования: Grover Chander, Agrawal Sonia, Singhal Aakash. Nail Changes in Secondary Syphilis: A Report of 3 Cases and Review of Literature.. Skin appendage disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1159/000546719.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.