Urology · 2009
Randomized controlled multisite trial of injected bulking agents for women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency: mid-urethral injection of Zuidex via the Implacer versus proximal urethral injection of Contigen cystoscopically.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lightner Deborah, Rovner Eric, Corcos Jacques, Payne Christopher, Brubaker Linda, Drutz Harold, Steinhoff Gary, Zuidex Study Group
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether Zuidex using a non-cystoscopy mid-urethral injection technique produces as good a result (i.e. was not inferior) as Contigen injected endoscopically at the bladder neck in the treatment of urinary stress incontinence secondary to intrinsic sphincter deficiency in adult women.
METHODS: A prospective 2:1 randomized trial of mid-urethral injections of Zuidex-Implacer vs proximal urethral cystoscopic injections of Contigen was performed in 344 women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency at 23 North American sites, and followed up for >1 year from last treatment.
RESULTS: Outcomes at 12 months from last treatment failed to demonstrate that mid-urethral injected Zuidex was equivalent to cystoscopically injected Contigen in primary and secondary outcome variables. The primary outcome, the proportion of women who achieved a 50% reduction in urinary leakage on provocation testing, was achieved in 84% of Contigen-treated women vs 65% of Zuidex-treated women.
CONCLUSIONS: Confounding multiple variables inherent in the study design make a detailed analysis of study outcomes difficult.
METHODS: A prospective 2:1 randomized trial of mid-urethral injections of Zuidex-Implacer vs proximal urethral cystoscopic injections of Contigen was performed in 344 women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency at 23 North American sites, and followed up for >1 year from last treatment.
RESULTS: Outcomes at 12 months from last treatment failed to demonstrate that mid-urethral injected Zuidex was equivalent to cystoscopically injected Contigen in primary and secondary outcome variables. The primary outcome, the proportion of women who achieved a 50% reduction in urinary leakage on provocation testing, was achieved in 84% of Contigen-treated women vs 65% of Zuidex-treated women.
CONCLUSIONS: Confounding multiple variables inherent in the study design make a detailed analysis of study outcomes difficult.