Long-term vs short-term tocolysis with ritodrine hydrochloride: Propensity score-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the short-term tocolysis protocol is as effective as the traditional long-term tocolysis protocol with intravenous ritodrine hydrochloride for preterm labour.

STUDY

DESIGN

This single-centre, retrospective, observational study was conducted at Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan between April 2016 and July 2021. At the study hospital, the management protocol for preterm labour after 26 weeks of gestation was changed from the long-term tocolysis protocol to the short-term tocolysis protocol in November 2019. This study compared patients managed with the two protocols, using propensity score analysis to overcome the potential weaknesses of a retrospective study. The primary outcome was the frequency of preterm birth before 34 weeks of gestation before and after the protocol was revised. The secondary outcomes were frequency of neonatal intensive care unit admission and frequency of neonatal chronic lung disease.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 82 patients managed by the long-term tocolysis protocol and 56 patients managed by the short-term tocolysis protocol. After propensity score-weighted adjustment, the median durations of intravenous ritodrine administration in the long-term and short-term protocols were 18 days and 3 days, respectively. Differences were not detected between the long-term and short-term protocols in terms of the frequency of preterm delivery before 34 weeks of gestation [23.7 % vs 21.6 %, risk ratio (RR) 0.91, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.47-1.77], frequency of neonatal intensive care unit admission due to preterm birth (49.5 % vs 39.3 %, RR 0.79, 95 % CI 0.53-1.19) and frequency of neonatal chronic lung disease (4.4 % vs 9.2 %, RR 2.07, 95 % CI 0.51-8.48).

CONCLUSION

Using propensity score analysis, changing from the long-term tocolysis protocol to the short-term tocolysis protocol for the management of preterm labour after 26 weeks of gestation did not have a negative effect on the frequency of preterm birth or neonatal prognosis.