Prediction and risk evaluation of delirium after surgery in older patients: development and internal validation of an algorithm from the prospective BioCog cohort study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Postoperative delirium (POD) affects ∼20% of older surgical patients. It is associated with poor clinical outcome and increased mortality. We aimed to identify the major POD risk factors and to develop and validate a multivariate algorithm for individual POD risk prediction and risk evaluation in the very early postoperative period.
METHODS
BioCog is a prospective cohort study conducted in the anaesthesiology departments of two tertiary care centres in Germany and The Netherlands. Patients aged ≥65 yr with no preoperative dementia (Mini-Mental Status Examination ≥24) undergoing surgery with an expected duration of at least 60 min were enrolled and screened for POD according to DSM 5 until the seventh postoperative day. Clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging data, and blood were measured before and after surgery. We evaluated several models by sequentially adding blocks of variables. Gradient-boosted trees (GBT) with nested cross-validation were used for POD prediction. Model accuracy (area under the receiver-operating curve, AUC) and calibration were assessed (Brier score).
RESULTS
Out of 929 patients, 184 (20%) experienced POD. A GBT algorithm using both preoperative data, characteristics of the intervention, and postoperative changes in laboratory parameters achieved the highest AUC (0.83, [0.79-0.86]) with a Brier score of 0.12 (0.12-0.13).
CONCLUSIONS
Models combining preoperative with precipitating factors during surgery predict POD with high accuracy. This suggests that the resulting algorithms eventually may become useful to support clinical decision-making.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02265263.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.