BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used to Assess Surgical Interventions for Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Stress Urinary Incontinence and Mesh Complications: A Scoping Review for the Development of the APPRAISE PROM.
СтатьяScoping ReviewНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Forshall Georgina, Budds Kirsty, Fisher Victoria, Jha Swati, Gray Thomas G, Doumouchtsis Stergios K, Bagnall Anne-Marie, Jones Georgina L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This scoping review was undertaken as part of an NIHR-commissioned study, APPRAISE, to develop a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) and experience measure (PREM) to assess outcomes relevant to surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic mesh complications surgery, with cross-cultural applicability.
OBJECTIVES: To identify PROMs and PREMs used to assess POP, SUI and mesh complication surgery; to compare the length, recall periods, response options of these tools and the outcomes/experiences assessed.
SEARCH STRATEGY: Three databases searched from inception to September 2023 were screened by two independent reviewers.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Primary studies using subjective measures to assess POP, SUI and mesh complication surgery for women aged 16+ years were eligible for inclusion. Related systematic reviews were also reviewed.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted into a piloted electronic form by one reviewer and checked by a second. A narrative synthesis of the data was performed.
MAIN RESULTS: Of the 2079 included primary studies, 1607 (77%) used a PROM with evidence of psychometric testing. Five hundred and twenty-two (25%) studies used one PROM; 1082 studies (52%) used two or more PROMs. One hundred and fifty-one measures were extracted; of these, condition-specific measures were the most highly cited. There was limited use of PROMs specific to surgery, mental health, body image and PREMs. Some outcomes (e.g., urinary symptoms, emotional wellbeing) are measured in a significantly higher proportion of PROMs than other outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently, no existing validated PROM evaluates all patient-reported outcomes relevant to surgery for POP, SUI or mesh complications.
OBJECTIVES: To identify PROMs and PREMs used to assess POP, SUI and mesh complication surgery; to compare the length, recall periods, response options of these tools and the outcomes/experiences assessed.
SEARCH STRATEGY: Three databases searched from inception to September 2023 were screened by two independent reviewers.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Primary studies using subjective measures to assess POP, SUI and mesh complication surgery for women aged 16+ years were eligible for inclusion. Related systematic reviews were also reviewed.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted into a piloted electronic form by one reviewer and checked by a second. A narrative synthesis of the data was performed.
MAIN RESULTS: Of the 2079 included primary studies, 1607 (77%) used a PROM with evidence of psychometric testing. Five hundred and twenty-two (25%) studies used one PROM; 1082 studies (52%) used two or more PROMs. One hundred and fifty-one measures were extracted; of these, condition-specific measures were the most highly cited. There was limited use of PROMs specific to surgery, mental health, body image and PREMs. Some outcomes (e.g., urinary symptoms, emotional wellbeing) are measured in a significantly higher proportion of PROMs than other outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently, no existing validated PROM evaluates all patient-reported outcomes relevant to surgery for POP, SUI or mesh complications.