Journal of pediatric nursing · 2025
Examination of the implementation determinants of skin-to-skin care in the pediatric cardiac Intensive Care Unit.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lisanti Amy Jo, Demianczyk Abigail C, Whittaker Jennifer, Nag Diya, Kellom Katherine, Brennan Claire, Hayden-Rush Christina, Herrup Elizabeth A, Grabill Megan, O'Brien Caroline, Min Jungwon, Bettencourt Amanda P
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Skin-to-skin care (SSC), where parents hold their unclothed baby directly on their bare chest, is regarded as best practice for hospitalized infants. SSC is not routine for infants with complex congenital heart disease (cCHD) in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (PCICU). SSC is understudied and the contextual factors influencing its implementation in the PCICU are unknown. This multisite, multi-methods study using the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases implementation determinants framework aimed to identify the contextual factors influencing the implementation of SSC in the PCICU.
METHODS: We interviewed stakeholders across two US PCICUs, one with previous implementation experience of SSC and one with little to no implementation experience. We used purposive snowball sampling, representing the interdisciplinary team of clinicians (n = 25) and parents (n = 21) at each site, until we reached thematic saturation. Clinicians completed a suite of valid and reliable surveys of acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness measures, with comparative analysis across clinician characteristics. Cross-cutting key themes were generated from a combined inductive and deductive approach to content analysis.
RESULTS: On a five-point Likert scale, clinicians rated their acceptability (mean = 4.7, SD = 0.4), feasibility (mean = 4.2, SD = 0.7), and appropriateness (mean = 4.5, SD = 0.5) of SSC in the PCICU within the agree/completely agree range. Cross-cutting themes included knowledge, communication, role clarity, resources, and safety.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings will be the foundation for implementation mapping, where identified barriers and facilitators are linked with evidence-based implementation strategies that can be tested to enhance the implementation of SSC in the PCICU.
METHODS: We interviewed stakeholders across two US PCICUs, one with previous implementation experience of SSC and one with little to no implementation experience. We used purposive snowball sampling, representing the interdisciplinary team of clinicians (n = 25) and parents (n = 21) at each site, until we reached thematic saturation. Clinicians completed a suite of valid and reliable surveys of acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness measures, with comparative analysis across clinician characteristics. Cross-cutting key themes were generated from a combined inductive and deductive approach to content analysis.
RESULTS: On a five-point Likert scale, clinicians rated their acceptability (mean = 4.7, SD = 0.4), feasibility (mean = 4.2, SD = 0.7), and appropriateness (mean = 4.5, SD = 0.5) of SSC in the PCICU within the agree/completely agree range. Cross-cutting themes included knowledge, communication, role clarity, resources, and safety.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings will be the foundation for implementation mapping, where identified barriers and facilitators are linked with evidence-based implementation strategies that can be tested to enhance the implementation of SSC in the PCICU.