Frontiers in oncology · 2025
Efficacy of opioid-free anesthesia in short-term recovery following laparoscopic-assisted colorectal tumor resection: a randomized trial.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Liang, Yu Xian-Hua, Zhang Hui-Ming, Wang Sheng, Chen Jian-Long, Li Xue-Shan, Chen Zhi-Yuan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate whether opioid-free anesthesia is non-inferior to opioid-based anesthesia in terms of short-term recovery quality in patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted colorectal tumor resection.
METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 102 participants, who were randomly assigned to one of two groups: opioid-free general anesthesia with thoracic epidural anesthesia (OFA) group and opioid-based general anesthesia with compound transversalis fascia nerve block (OA) group. The primary observation outcomes were the preoperative and postoperative Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire scores.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in preoperative or postoperative QoR-40 scores between the two groups (p = 0.05). However, the OFA group demonstrated a significantly longer recovery time in the recovery room compared to the OA group (p< 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to first meal after surgery, postoperative drainage tube removal time, postoperative sufentanil dose, or postoperative 24-hour numerical rating scale (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Opioid-free general anesthesia is not superior to opioid-based general anesthesia with transversalis fascia nerve block in terms of short-term postoperative recovery quality following laparoscopic-assisted colorectal tumor resection.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier 2023-12-08.
METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 102 participants, who were randomly assigned to one of two groups: opioid-free general anesthesia with thoracic epidural anesthesia (OFA) group and opioid-based general anesthesia with compound transversalis fascia nerve block (OA) group. The primary observation outcomes were the preoperative and postoperative Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire scores.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in preoperative or postoperative QoR-40 scores between the two groups (p = 0.05). However, the OFA group demonstrated a significantly longer recovery time in the recovery room compared to the OA group (p< 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to first meal after surgery, postoperative drainage tube removal time, postoperative sufentanil dose, or postoperative 24-hour numerical rating scale (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Opioid-free general anesthesia is not superior to opioid-based general anesthesia with transversalis fascia nerve block in terms of short-term postoperative recovery quality following laparoscopic-assisted colorectal tumor resection.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier 2023-12-08.