Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR · 1996
Nonsurgical management of gastric or duodenal perforation from a Wills-Oglesby-type gastrostomy tube.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kanterman R Y, Hicks M E, Simpson K R, Malden E S, Picus D, Darcy M D
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To describe the clinical and radiologic appearance of gastrointestinal perforation related to a Wills-Oglesby-type gastrostomy tube, as well as techniques for nonsurgical management.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five patients with a previously placed 14-F modified Wills-Oglesby-type gastrostomy catheter experienced viscus perforation by the distal limb of the catheter during a 30-month period.
RESULTS: The average interval between tube placement and perforation event was 4.3 months. Three patients had migration of the gastrostomy tube into the duodenum and subsequent duodenal perforation. One patient had posterior perforation of the stomach, and one patient developed a gastrocolic fistula. Generalized peritonitis was not present in any patient. All patients were treated successfully without surgery, and tube feedings were re-established in 4-14 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Gastrostomy tube-related perforation is an uncommon, delayed complication of percutaneous gastrostomy with the modified Wills-Oglesby-type catheter. Nonsurgical management is feasible in select instances. Because of these gastrointestinal perforations, the gastrostomy tube has been modified (eliminating the distal tip), and no gastrostomy-associated gastrointestinal perforation has been experienced since.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five patients with a previously placed 14-F modified Wills-Oglesby-type gastrostomy catheter experienced viscus perforation by the distal limb of the catheter during a 30-month period.
RESULTS: The average interval between tube placement and perforation event was 4.3 months. Three patients had migration of the gastrostomy tube into the duodenum and subsequent duodenal perforation. One patient had posterior perforation of the stomach, and one patient developed a gastrocolic fistula. Generalized peritonitis was not present in any patient. All patients were treated successfully without surgery, and tube feedings were re-established in 4-14 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Gastrostomy tube-related perforation is an uncommon, delayed complication of percutaneous gastrostomy with the modified Wills-Oglesby-type catheter. Nonsurgical management is feasible in select instances. Because of these gastrointestinal perforations, the gastrostomy tube has been modified (eliminating the distal tip), and no gastrostomy-associated gastrointestinal perforation has been experienced since.