BMC medical genomics · 2025
Comprehensive chromosomal abnormality detection: integrating CNV-Seq with traditional karyotyping in prenatal diagnostics.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huang Yan, Fu Shuai, Shao Di, Yao Yanhua, Wu Fangyan, Yao Minrong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of copy number variation sequencing (CNV-Seq) in detecting chromosomal abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis, comparing its performance with traditional karyotype analysis.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1001 prenatal samples collected between April 2021 and December 2023. Samples were analyzed using both CNV-Seq and karyotype analysis. The detection rates of chromosomal abnormalities were compared between the two methods across various prenatal diagnostic indications. Clinical follow-up was performed to assess pregnancy outcomes.
RESULTS: CNV-Seq detected chromosomal abnormalities in 89 of 1,001 cases (8.9%), compared to 50 cases (5.0%) identified by traditional karyotyping. CNV-Seq not only detected all abnormalities identified by karyotyping, including common aneuploidies such as trisomy 21 and sex chromosome abnormalities, but also uncovered 53 additional pathogenic submicroscopic CNVs associated with 33 known syndromes. The detection rates of CNV-Seq were significantly higher in high-risk groups, such as those identified by non-invasive prenatal testing (HR-NIPT) and maternal serum screening (HR-MSS), demonstrating superior sensitivity and accuracy in prenatal diagnostics.
CONCLUSION: CNV-Seq demonstrated superior sensitivity in detecting chromosomal abnormalities, particularly submicroscopic alterations, compared to traditional karyotyping. The study highlights the potential of CNV-Seq as a valuable tool in prenatal diagnostics, offering improved detection of genetic abnormalities and guiding clinical decision-making. However, a combined approach using both CNV-Seq and karyotype analysis is recommended for comprehensive prenatal genetic screening.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1001 prenatal samples collected between April 2021 and December 2023. Samples were analyzed using both CNV-Seq and karyotype analysis. The detection rates of chromosomal abnormalities were compared between the two methods across various prenatal diagnostic indications. Clinical follow-up was performed to assess pregnancy outcomes.
RESULTS: CNV-Seq detected chromosomal abnormalities in 89 of 1,001 cases (8.9%), compared to 50 cases (5.0%) identified by traditional karyotyping. CNV-Seq not only detected all abnormalities identified by karyotyping, including common aneuploidies such as trisomy 21 and sex chromosome abnormalities, but also uncovered 53 additional pathogenic submicroscopic CNVs associated with 33 known syndromes. The detection rates of CNV-Seq were significantly higher in high-risk groups, such as those identified by non-invasive prenatal testing (HR-NIPT) and maternal serum screening (HR-MSS), demonstrating superior sensitivity and accuracy in prenatal diagnostics.
CONCLUSION: CNV-Seq demonstrated superior sensitivity in detecting chromosomal abnormalities, particularly submicroscopic alterations, compared to traditional karyotyping. The study highlights the potential of CNV-Seq as a valuable tool in prenatal diagnostics, offering improved detection of genetic abnormalities and guiding clinical decision-making. However, a combined approach using both CNV-Seq and karyotype analysis is recommended for comprehensive prenatal genetic screening.