Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Managing Apathy in Older Adults with Neurocognitive Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVES
Apathy is among the most common neuropsychiatric features of late-life neurocognitive disorders and predicts functional decline and greater caregiver burden. As no treatment is formally established, identifying effective interventions is a priority. We systematically reviewed non-pharmacological randomized controlled trials (RCTs) targeting apathy in older adults with neurocognitive disorders.
METHODS
We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycInfo, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar (final search 23 March 2026). Eligible studies were non-pharmacological RCTs reporting an apathy outcome. Evidence levels were graded with OCEBM and quality with PEDro; two reviewers mapped PEDro items onto Cochrane risk-of-bias domains. Reporting followed PRISMA 2020.
RESULTS
Sixty-two RCTs were included. Physical exercise and music-based interventions showed the most consistent benefit, whereas technology-based and brain stimulation approaches remained experimental. Only 30 trials (48%) showed a significant between-group effect on apathy-most were null, within-group, or had apathy as a secondary outcome. Marked heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Most trials were of moderate to high quality, though near-universal performance bias arose from the inability to blind participants and providers.
CONCLUSIONS
Managing apathy in these populations remains challenging, and the certainty of the evidence is limited. Purpose-built, apathy-focused trials reporting effect sizes and durability are needed before disease-specific recommendations can be made.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.