MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/gox.0000000000002045

Медицинская библиотека · Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2019

An Innovative Thread-looping Method for Facial Rejuvenation: Minimal Access Multiple Plane Suspension.

Wang Chao-Huei, Liu Heng-Jen, Tsai Yun-Ta, Lin Hsin-I, Wu Po-Yi, Lin Jheng-Wei

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Management of facial rejuvenation has evolved over past decades. Facelift with barbed suture is a minimally invasive surgical technique for facial rejuvenation. This study examined the efficacy and associated complications of a new thread-looping procedure called minimal access multiple plane suspension.

METHODS

A total of 103 thread lifts were performed between 2014 and 2017. Patient satisfaction and adverse effects were evaluated.

RESULTS

In the majority of patients (88/103, 85.4%), the results obtained were considered satisfactory 3 months after the procedure. The incidence of complications was low. Only 5.8% of the patients had slight postoperation asymmetry that was easily corrected. Minor complications experienced by patients included palpable suture knots (12.6%), persistent facial swelling (7.88%), and facial dimpling (2.9%). The causes of procedure-related complications were reviewed and discussed.

CONCLUSION

Reinforced by select anchoring points, "minimal access multiple plane suspension" suspends ptotic anatomic tissues, serving as an effective facial rejuvenation procedure with minimal downtime and satisfactory cosmetic results.

Для цитирования: Wang Chao-Huei, Liu Heng-Jen, Tsai Yun-Ta, Lin Hsin-I, Wu Po-Yi, Lin Jheng-Wei. An Innovative Thread-looping Method for Facial Rejuvenation: Minimal Access Multiple Plane Suspension.. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open. 2019. DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000002045.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.