Sexually transmitted diseases · 2024
Analysis of 2019 Ohio Disease Intervention Specialist Records for Syphilis Cases Using Clustering Algorithms.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chakraborty Payal, Ning Xia, McNeill Mary, Kline David M, Shoben Abigail B, Miller William C, Norris Turner Abigail
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Developments in natural language processing and unsupervised machine learning methodologies (e.g., clustering) have given researchers new tools to analyze both structured and unstructured health data. We applied these methods to 2019 Ohio disease intervention specialist (DIS) syphilis records, to determine whether these methods can uncover novel patterns of co-occurrence of individual characteristics, risk factors, and clinical characteristics of syphilis that are not yet reported in the literature.
METHODS: The 2019 disease intervention specialist syphilis records (n = 1996) contain both structured data (categorical and numerical variables) and unstructured notes. In the structured data, we examined case demographics, syphilis risk factors, and clinical characteristics of syphilis. For the unstructured text, we applied TF-IDF (term frequency multiplied by inverse document frequency) weights, a common way to convert text into numerical representations. We performed agglomerative clustering with cosine similarity using the CLUTO software.
RESULTS: The cluster analysis yielded 6 clusters of syphilis cases based on patterns in the structured and unstructured data. The average internal similarities were much higher than the average external similarities, indicating that the clusters were well formed. The factors underlying 3 of the clusters related to patterns of missing data. The factors underlying the other 3 clusters were sexual behaviors and partnerships. Notably, 1 of the 3 consisted of individuals who reported oral sex with male or anonymous partners while intoxicated, and one comprised mainly of males who have sex with females.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis resulted in clusters that were well formed mathematically, but did not reveal novel epidemiological information about syphilis risk factors or transmission that were not already known.
METHODS: The 2019 disease intervention specialist syphilis records (n = 1996) contain both structured data (categorical and numerical variables) and unstructured notes. In the structured data, we examined case demographics, syphilis risk factors, and clinical characteristics of syphilis. For the unstructured text, we applied TF-IDF (term frequency multiplied by inverse document frequency) weights, a common way to convert text into numerical representations. We performed agglomerative clustering with cosine similarity using the CLUTO software.
RESULTS: The cluster analysis yielded 6 clusters of syphilis cases based on patterns in the structured and unstructured data. The average internal similarities were much higher than the average external similarities, indicating that the clusters were well formed. The factors underlying 3 of the clusters related to patterns of missing data. The factors underlying the other 3 clusters were sexual behaviors and partnerships. Notably, 1 of the 3 consisted of individuals who reported oral sex with male or anonymous partners while intoxicated, and one comprised mainly of males who have sex with females.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis resulted in clusters that were well formed mathematically, but did not reveal novel epidemiological information about syphilis risk factors or transmission that were not already known.