The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2010
Placement of laminaria tents does not improve time to delivery in patients undergoing second trimester labor induction with misoprostol.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Thornburg Loralei L, Grace Daniel, Gray Angela L, Glantz J Christopher, Pressman Eva K
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether placement of laminaria tents improve time to delivery compared with misoprostol alone in second trimester labor induction.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing second trimester labor induction. Patients with ruptured membranes, abruption, cervical dilation and chorioamnionitis at presentation were excluded. Complications were defined as chorioamnionitis, retained placenta or other surgical procedures. Patients who received laminaria and vaginal misoprostol, 200 microg every 12 h, were compared to those who received misoprostol without laminaria.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients met inclusion criteria, 19 underwent induction with misoprostol alone and 24 with laminaria and misoprostol. The median times to fetal and placenta deliveries were 16.4 and 0.0 h in the misoprostol group, and 20.6 and 0.2 h in the laminaria group. There was no difference in complications. Post-hoc power analysis revealed >80% power to detect a difference in time to delivery of >12 h, and >90% power to detect a difference in time to placental delivery of > or =30 min.
CONCLUSIONS: Placement of laminaria does not improve fetal or placental delivery times in patients undergoing second trimester pregnancy termination by labor induction.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing second trimester labor induction. Patients with ruptured membranes, abruption, cervical dilation and chorioamnionitis at presentation were excluded. Complications were defined as chorioamnionitis, retained placenta or other surgical procedures. Patients who received laminaria and vaginal misoprostol, 200 microg every 12 h, were compared to those who received misoprostol without laminaria.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients met inclusion criteria, 19 underwent induction with misoprostol alone and 24 with laminaria and misoprostol. The median times to fetal and placenta deliveries were 16.4 and 0.0 h in the misoprostol group, and 20.6 and 0.2 h in the laminaria group. There was no difference in complications. Post-hoc power analysis revealed >80% power to detect a difference in time to delivery of >12 h, and >90% power to detect a difference in time to placental delivery of > or =30 min.
CONCLUSIONS: Placement of laminaria does not improve fetal or placental delivery times in patients undergoing second trimester pregnancy termination by labor induction.