Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026
Dynamic Risk Trajectories for Sudden Cardiac Arrest: The Role of Recurrent Cardiovascular Events.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pope Marita Knudsen, Chugh Harpriya, Truyen Thien Tan Tri Tai, Mathias Marco, Uy-Evanado Audrey, Lin Honghuang, Atar Dan, Bosson Nichole, Reinier Kyndaron, Benjamin Emelia J, Chugh Sumeet S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although cardiovascular events increase sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) risk, the impact of recurrent events on subsequent SCA risk in a contemporary population is unknown. This study assessed whether patients with a first-time acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or heart failure (HF) hospitalization who experience a recurrent cardiovascular event have increased SCA risk.
METHODS: The OSCAR (Observational Study of Cardiac Arrest Risk) is a prospective cohort with adjudicated SCA outcomes. The current study followed up patients who survived a first ACS or HF hospitalization (the index ACS or HF cohorts) for recurrent cardiovascular events and SCA. Recurrent event was a time-dependent variable in Cox models predicting SCA. Findings were validated in the FHS (Framingham Heart Study).
RESULTS: Among 2946 patients in the index ACS cohort, incidence of SCA was higher following a recurrent ACS event than without (3.70 versus 1.28 per 100 patient-years). A recurrent ACS event was associated with higher risk of SCA (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.15 [95% CI, 2.06-4.83]; P<0.0001). Among 6711 patients in the index HF cohort, incidence of SCA was higher following a recurrent HF event than without (1.35 versus 0.97 per 100 patient-years), and SCA risk was higher with recurrent HF (HR, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.44-2.23]; P<0.0001). In the FHS cohort, risk of SCA was higher with recurrent ACS (HR, 2.85 [95% CI, 1.66-4.90]; P=0.0002); the association was not significant for recurrent HF (HR, 1.49 [95% CI, 0.73-3.03]; P=0.27).
CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent events were associated with higher risk of SCA; dynamic clinical trajectories of recurrent cardiovascular events may inform prevention of SCA.
METHODS: The OSCAR (Observational Study of Cardiac Arrest Risk) is a prospective cohort with adjudicated SCA outcomes. The current study followed up patients who survived a first ACS or HF hospitalization (the index ACS or HF cohorts) for recurrent cardiovascular events and SCA. Recurrent event was a time-dependent variable in Cox models predicting SCA. Findings were validated in the FHS (Framingham Heart Study).
RESULTS: Among 2946 patients in the index ACS cohort, incidence of SCA was higher following a recurrent ACS event than without (3.70 versus 1.28 per 100 patient-years). A recurrent ACS event was associated with higher risk of SCA (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.15 [95% CI, 2.06-4.83]; P<0.0001). Among 6711 patients in the index HF cohort, incidence of SCA was higher following a recurrent HF event than without (1.35 versus 0.97 per 100 patient-years), and SCA risk was higher with recurrent HF (HR, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.44-2.23]; P<0.0001). In the FHS cohort, risk of SCA was higher with recurrent ACS (HR, 2.85 [95% CI, 1.66-4.90]; P=0.0002); the association was not significant for recurrent HF (HR, 1.49 [95% CI, 0.73-3.03]; P=0.27).
CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent events were associated with higher risk of SCA; dynamic clinical trajectories of recurrent cardiovascular events may inform prevention of SCA.