Metabolites · 2026
TyG-Centered Endocrine-Metabolic Architecture in Patients with Thyroid Dysfunction: A Systems Phenotyping Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Frandes Mirela, Gherbon Adriana, Tudor Anca, Albai Oana, Vlad Mihaela Maria, Muntean Călin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Metabolic dysfunction is a complex process arising from coordinated interactions among insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, hepatic dysfunction, obesity, low-grade inflammation, and endocrine alterations. The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index is a simple, reproducible surrogate of insulin resistance, but most studies have evaluated it through isolated association-based analyses. We characterized the endocrine-metabolic architecture associated with TyG in patients with thyroid dysfunction using a systems-phenotyping approach.
METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional study of 387 adults evaluated for thyroid dysfunction, unsupervised phenotypes were derived by principal component analysis (PCA), K-means, Gaussian mixture models (GMM), and hierarchical (Ward) clustering using fully measured primary metabolic variables (fasting glucose, triglycerides, HDL- and LDL-cholesterol, body mass index, alanine, and aspartate aminotransferase). TyG was then examined as a descriptor of the identified architecture. Model-based latent profile analysis (BIC, entropy) and a censoring-aware, rank-based Gaussian graphical model (GGM) of partial correlations were additionally estimated.
RESULTS: Three overlapping, clinically interpretable phenotypic partitions of an underlying metabolic continuum were identified: a metabolically preserved phenotype (MP), an intermediate hepatic-dominant phenotype (IHD), and a severe insulin-resistance-dominant phenotype (SIRD), characterized by obesity, atherogenic dyslipidemia, and hyperuricemia. TyG values increased monotonically across the three partitions (medians 8.24, 8.74, and 8.87 in MP, IHD, and SIRD, respectively; p < 0.001), providing an accessible single-number summary of the metabolic gradient. Cluster separation was modest (silhouette = 0.17), consistent with a continuum, but the three-profile solution was supported by latent profile analysis (ΔBIC = -96.7; relative entropy = 0.75) and was reproduced across frameworks (adjusted Rand index of 0.75 with GMM and 0.46 with Ward). In the censoring-aware GGM, metabolic and thyroid variables formed two near-orthogonal blocks (maximum absolute metabolic-thyroid partial correlation: 0.16; median: 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The systems phenotyping approach identified three clinically interpretable phenotypic partitions (MP, IHD, SIRD) along a metabolic continuum in patients evaluated for thyroid dysfunction. TyG values increased monotonically across partitions (medians 8.24, 8.74, 8.87) and provided a pragmatic single-number summary of the principal metabolic axis. The IHD phenotype indicates that hepatic dysregulation can emerge as a distinct early stage rather than solely a late consequence of insulin resistance. Metabolic and thyroid axes were near-orthogonal, positioning thyroid autoimmunity as a parallel modulatory layer. These findings support TyG as an accessible descriptor for multidimensional endocrine-metabolic risk stratification.
METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional study of 387 adults evaluated for thyroid dysfunction, unsupervised phenotypes were derived by principal component analysis (PCA), K-means, Gaussian mixture models (GMM), and hierarchical (Ward) clustering using fully measured primary metabolic variables (fasting glucose, triglycerides, HDL- and LDL-cholesterol, body mass index, alanine, and aspartate aminotransferase). TyG was then examined as a descriptor of the identified architecture. Model-based latent profile analysis (BIC, entropy) and a censoring-aware, rank-based Gaussian graphical model (GGM) of partial correlations were additionally estimated.
RESULTS: Three overlapping, clinically interpretable phenotypic partitions of an underlying metabolic continuum were identified: a metabolically preserved phenotype (MP), an intermediate hepatic-dominant phenotype (IHD), and a severe insulin-resistance-dominant phenotype (SIRD), characterized by obesity, atherogenic dyslipidemia, and hyperuricemia. TyG values increased monotonically across the three partitions (medians 8.24, 8.74, and 8.87 in MP, IHD, and SIRD, respectively; p < 0.001), providing an accessible single-number summary of the metabolic gradient. Cluster separation was modest (silhouette = 0.17), consistent with a continuum, but the three-profile solution was supported by latent profile analysis (ΔBIC = -96.7; relative entropy = 0.75) and was reproduced across frameworks (adjusted Rand index of 0.75 with GMM and 0.46 with Ward). In the censoring-aware GGM, metabolic and thyroid variables formed two near-orthogonal blocks (maximum absolute metabolic-thyroid partial correlation: 0.16; median: 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The systems phenotyping approach identified three clinically interpretable phenotypic partitions (MP, IHD, SIRD) along a metabolic continuum in patients evaluated for thyroid dysfunction. TyG values increased monotonically across partitions (medians 8.24, 8.74, 8.87) and provided a pragmatic single-number summary of the principal metabolic axis. The IHD phenotype indicates that hepatic dysregulation can emerge as a distinct early stage rather than solely a late consequence of insulin resistance. Metabolic and thyroid axes were near-orthogonal, positioning thyroid autoimmunity as a parallel modulatory layer. These findings support TyG as an accessible descriptor for multidimensional endocrine-metabolic risk stratification.