European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2021
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in old patients: clinical features, angiographic findings, management and outcome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Díez-Villanueva Pablo, García-Guimaraes Marcos, Sanz-Ruiz Ricardo, Roura Gerard, Macaya Fernando, Barahona Alvarado Jean Christophe, Tizón-Marcos Helena, Flores-Ríos Xacobe, Masotti Mónica, Lezcano-Pertejo Cristina, Cortés Carlos, Fuertes-Ferre Georgina, Becerra-Muñoz Víctor Manuel, Lozano Ruiz-Poveda Fernando, Valero Ernesto, Portero-Portaz Juan José, Vera Alberto, Salamanca Jorge, Alfonso Fernando
Аннотация
AIMS: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a relatively rare but well-known cause of acute coronary syndrome. Clinical features, angiographic findings, management and outcomes of SCAD in old patients (>65 years of age) remain unknown.
METHODS AND RESULTS: The Spanish multicentre prospective SCAD registry (NCT03607981), included 318 consecutive patients with SCAD. Data were collected between June 2015 and April 2019. All angiograms were analysed in a centralized corelab. For the purposes of this study, patients were classified according to age in two groups <65 and ≥65 years old and in-hospital outcomes were analysed. Fifty-five patients (17%) were ≥65 years old (95% women). Older patients had more often hypertension (76% vs. 29%, P < 0.01) and dyslipidaemia (56% vs. 30%, P < 0.01), and less previous (4% vs. 18%, P < 0.001) or current smoking habit (4% vs. 33%, P < 0.001). An identifiable trigger was less often present in old patients (27% vs. 43%, P = 0.028). They also had more often severe coronary tortuosity (36% vs. 11%, P = 0.036) and showed more frequently coronary ectasia (24% vs. 9%, P < 0.01). Older patients were more often managed conservatively (89% vs. 75%, P = 0.025), with no significant differences in major adverse cardiac events during index admission (7% vs. 8%, P = 0.858). There were no differences between groups in terms of in-hospital stay, new acute myocardial infarction, unplanned coronary angiography or heart failure.
CONCLUSION: Older patients with SCAD show different clinical and angiographic characteristics compared with younger patients. Initial treatment strategy was different between groups, though in-hospital outcomes do not significantly differ (NCT03607981).
METHODS AND RESULTS: The Spanish multicentre prospective SCAD registry (NCT03607981), included 318 consecutive patients with SCAD. Data were collected between June 2015 and April 2019. All angiograms were analysed in a centralized corelab. For the purposes of this study, patients were classified according to age in two groups <65 and ≥65 years old and in-hospital outcomes were analysed. Fifty-five patients (17%) were ≥65 years old (95% women). Older patients had more often hypertension (76% vs. 29%, P < 0.01) and dyslipidaemia (56% vs. 30%, P < 0.01), and less previous (4% vs. 18%, P < 0.001) or current smoking habit (4% vs. 33%, P < 0.001). An identifiable trigger was less often present in old patients (27% vs. 43%, P = 0.028). They also had more often severe coronary tortuosity (36% vs. 11%, P = 0.036) and showed more frequently coronary ectasia (24% vs. 9%, P < 0.01). Older patients were more often managed conservatively (89% vs. 75%, P = 0.025), with no significant differences in major adverse cardiac events during index admission (7% vs. 8%, P = 0.858). There were no differences between groups in terms of in-hospital stay, new acute myocardial infarction, unplanned coronary angiography or heart failure.
CONCLUSION: Older patients with SCAD show different clinical and angiographic characteristics compared with younger patients. Initial treatment strategy was different between groups, though in-hospital outcomes do not significantly differ (NCT03607981).